Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Why Have Mutual Funds Exited EaseMyTrip?
    • Sharp outflows in March: Vallum Capital explains shift from liquid mutual funds to equities
    • 3 Vanguard ETFs Crushing the S&P 500 in 2026
    • High-Potential Mutual Funds to Invest in 2026
    • Bonds, Cash Remain Top Sources of Ballast for Equity Investors
    • Fidelity’s Most Underrated ETF Has Been Right About Bonds Longer Than Most Analysts
    • What Are Value Mutual Funds? How They Work, Know Top Funds | Markets News
    • Reeves considers using war bonds to fund defence spending push to avoid Labour row over cutting benefits
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Palos Verdes Peninsula School District shouldn’t be asking voters for a nearly $300 million bond – Daily Breeze
    Bonds

    Palos Verdes Peninsula School District shouldn’t be asking voters for a nearly $300 million bond – Daily Breeze

    October 14, 2024


    Measure SOS is a school bond on the ballot for voters in Palos Verdes. It would allow the Palos Verdes Peninsula School District to take on a debt of $297,800,000. The money would be used for repairs and updates to facilities. This debt would be repaid through an annual tax to all property owners in Palos Verdes over the next 20-27 years. Including interest, the total cost to local taxpayers would be close to half-a-billion dollars.

    How much would this bond cost each homeowner? Although the district claims a cost of $300 per one million of assessed valuation, this is an assumption based on a lot of variables. Nothing is guaranteed. The bond resolution actually contains the following disclaimer, “Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District.”

    Apparently, the maintenance on school buildings has been deferred to the point of crisis. However, as Julie Hamill mentioned in her most recent newsletter, in 2022 while she was campaigning for a seat on the school board, the district claimed that it “had more money than it knew what to do with”.

    At that time the school board spent time brainstorming about how to spend all the extra money. If facilities are at crisis level in 2024, then in 2022 the only discussion should have been: the buildings are about to fall to the ground, and every spare dollar must be put towards infrastructure. However, the buildings were not prioritized and the money was spent elsewhere.

    Also, let’s remember that in 2021 the district received a windfall of about $15,000,000 which could have been used to update the HVAC systems, but was instead used to purchase other items such as Social/Emotional learning curriculum.

    The LCFF (Local Control Funding Formula) is often pointed out as the source of the district’s financial problems. While it is true that under the current system Palos Verdes receives less per student than other districts, remember, this formula only went into effect in 2013. Prior to that time the district also deferred maintenance until the problems were extreme and could be used as leverage to promote a bond measure. In fact, we are still paying off debt on three bonds that were passed before 2013 (Measures R, K and S).

    In 2014 the voters in Palos Verdes passed Measure M, which is a permanent parcel tax on each property in the district. It has no sunset and increases every year. It was promoted to the community as a means to eliminate the need for future bonds. Although this income can be used for maintaining facilities, it has been directed elsewhere, and two bonds for improvements to facilities have been on the ballot since the adoption of Measure M. One possible solution would be to direct the funds from Measure M towards facilities.

    How will the district make the necessary repairs if Measure SOS does not pass? It is a question of fiscal responsibility. Every family and business must evaluate needs versus wants within a given budget. School facilities have not been prioritized by the district, so money has been spent in other areas.

    The solution to deferred maintenance is not a massive and unpredictable debt to be shouldered by property owners. The district simply needs to prioritize school buildings and make financial decisions accordingly. They may find themselves in a tough spot right now, but that is not the problem of ordinary people who do not use the public schools, which amounts to at least 75% of the population in Palos Verdes.

    The unrestricted annual income for PVPUSD is about $150,000,000 per year with additional income in restricted funds. Local control allows the unrestricted funds to be spent at the discretion of the School Board, with only 3% held in reserve. The other 97% is available.

    We must insist the public schools operate within their means.

    Charity Malin is a resident and property owner in Palos Verdes.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Bonds, Cash Remain Top Sources of Ballast for Equity Investors

    April 19, 2026

    Fidelity’s Most Underrated ETF Has Been Right About Bonds Longer Than Most Analysts

    April 19, 2026

    Reeves considers using war bonds to fund defence spending push to avoid Labour row over cutting benefits

    April 19, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    3 Vanguard ETFs Crushing the S&P 500 in 2026

    April 20, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Why Have Mutual Funds Exited EaseMyTrip?

    April 20, 2026

    From its listing price of ₹212 on the NSE in 2021 to now trading at…

    Sharp outflows in March: Vallum Capital explains shift from liquid mutual funds to equities

    April 20, 2026

    3 Vanguard ETFs Crushing the S&P 500 in 2026

    April 20, 2026

    High-Potential Mutual Funds to Invest in 2026

    April 19, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Could mutual funds see a new wave of investors? Maharashtra has paved the way.

    July 27, 2025

    Pope Leo issues Motu Proprio concerning Holy See investments

    October 7, 2025

    King Charles and Queen Camilla Samoa visit: Charles III seals new High Chief of Samoa title with sip of ‘ava in special ceremony

    October 24, 2024
    Our Picks

    Why Have Mutual Funds Exited EaseMyTrip?

    April 20, 2026

    Sharp outflows in March: Vallum Capital explains shift from liquid mutual funds to equities

    April 20, 2026

    3 Vanguard ETFs Crushing the S&P 500 in 2026

    April 20, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹50 lakh retirement corpus: How to invest in SCSS, mutual funds, equities and other assets — CA offers tips

    April 16, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.