Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Several SOL Staking ETFs May Be Approved Within 2 Weeks
    • NPR asks judge to stop CPB from taking money for satellite system away from NPR : NPR
    • CITs Outpace Mutual Funds in 2024
    • Supreme Court allows US to cancel $4 billion in foreign aid funds
    • Sarah Ferguson sells her £4.2million Belgravia townhouse – and funds ‘may keep her and Prince Andrew in the Royal Lodge in Windsor’
    • NIH Funds New Autism Studies on Genes and Environment as Trump Focuses on Tylenol
    • As Dollar Falls, Consider GLOBAL Investments!
    • Retail shifts funds into DeFi post $1.8B liquidations, is this MUTM for sustained 16x ROI this season?
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»ETFs»Should You Invest In Buffer ETFs? 2 Pros and Cons You Should Know
    ETFs

    Should You Invest In Buffer ETFs? 2 Pros and Cons You Should Know

    October 27, 2024


    Looking for the hottest new investment vehicle? Well, look no further. Buffer ETFs (exchange-traded funds) are currently one of Wall Street’s most popular offerings. Jason Zweig of The Wall Street Journal wrote, “In 2018, there were 13 of these funds managing a total of $3.8 billion, according to Morningstar; at the end of last month, 342 held a combined $108.3 billion.”

    Learn More: 2 Best Ways To Invest $1 a Day — and What It Can Grow To

    Try This: 9 Things You Must Do To Grow Your Wealth in 2024

    But, for the uninitiated, what are buffer ETFs — and are they a good investment choice?

    Trending Now:

    First, here’s what exactly traditional ETFs are: a type of pooled investment security that holds multiple underlying assets, such as stocks and bonds. ETFs are similar to mutual funds, differing primarily in that they can be traded all day, like a stock — as opposed to only after the market closes.

    Like most investments, however, ETFs are subject to market fluctuations.

    Enter buffer ETFs — also known as defined outcome ETFs — which use options contracts to insure against some losses while capturing some gains. Yet, they aren’t without drawbacks.

    GOBankingRates takes a look at the pros and cons of buffer ETFs, so you can adequately weigh the opportunity cost prior to diving in.

    Explore More: 5 Expert-Recommended Alternative Investments: How They Work and When To Invest

    The primary caveat with buffer ETFs is that, while they provide downside protection, they also limit an asset’s returns.

    “To buy that buffer, or protection against loss,” wrote Zweig, “you relinquish your right to participate fully in the potential gains.”

    For example, a buffer fund could hypothetically offer 50% protection against loss with a 7% upside cap. This means that you are shielded from losses if the market drops by up to 50%, but, if the market goes up 20%, you are still only entitled to a 7% return.

    This could be a desirable investment for those entering retirement and not wanting to risk losing money at a time when they won’t be able to earn it back, or for individuals saving up for a down payment on a home and wanting to shield their savings from a potential market drop, while still retaining the possibility of growth.

    In other words, if your time horizon is short and your risk profile is low, buffer ETFs could be a great option.

    However, as conventional wisdom goes, holding onto the content of one’s portfolio for the long haul typically leads to growth.

    “Over all 12-month periods since 1970, the U.S. stock market has gone up 80% of the time, with an average return of 12.3%,” wrote Zweig. By purchasing a fund that caps growth, investors could be leaving large amounts of money on the table.

    Plus, “buffer ETF investors typically don’t receive dividends, which have contributed up to 2.2% annual returns to the S&P 500 over the past 20 years,” wrote Kate Dore of CNBC.

    “With annual expenses typically under 1% and no commissions, [buffer] ETFs are much cheaper than fixed annuities or the complex debt instruments called structured notes that Wall Street has peddled relentlessly,” wrote Zweig. “They’re less risky than stocks alone, have no risk of default and are tax efficient.”

    Sounds great, right? Well, they could be. But make sure to read the fine print.

    Buffer ETFs have what is known as an “outcome period,” where traditional ETFs do not. This means full protections and full gains only apply if investors buy and hold the buffer fund for a set window of time — typically one year.

    “You may not get full upside exposure when buying midway through the outcome period,” wrote Dore. “Similarly, selling before the outcome period ends could limit downside protections.”

    Additionally, buffer ETFs have slightly higher fees than traditional ETFs: 0.8% for the average buffer ETF compared to 0.51% for the average traditional ETF.

    Buffer ETFs can be a fantastic investment for those looking to sleep better at night knowing they aren’t going to lose their entire life savings in a market crash. However, buffer ETFs do not net the most money over the long term.

    As with most financial decisions, take a look at your personal goals, risk profile and time horizon before pulling the trigger — and, of course, always review the terms and conditions.

    More From GOBankingRates

    This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Should You Invest In Buffer ETFs? 2 Pros and Cons You Should Know



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Several SOL Staking ETFs May Be Approved Within 2 Weeks

    September 26, 2025

    $10T Vanguard Plans to Offer Crypto ETFs to Brokerage Clients

    September 26, 2025

    How can advisors keep pace with the evolution of ETFs?

    September 26, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    NPR asks judge to stop CPB from taking money for satellite system away from NPR : NPR

    September 26, 2025

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    ETFs

    Several SOL Staking ETFs May Be Approved Within 2 Weeks

    September 26, 2025

    Several applications for Solana exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with staking could receive US approval by mid-October,…

    NPR asks judge to stop CPB from taking money for satellite system away from NPR : NPR

    September 26, 2025

    CITs Outpace Mutual Funds in 2024

    September 26, 2025

    Supreme Court allows US to cancel $4 billion in foreign aid funds

    September 26, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    What investors need to know as SEBI issues framework- The Week

    February 27, 2025

    SEBI clarifies rules for mutual fund portfolio changes after passive breaches

    June 26, 2025

    UK Local Authority Mulls Rare Foray Into Municipal Bond Market

    August 16, 2024
    Our Picks

    Several SOL Staking ETFs May Be Approved Within 2 Weeks

    September 26, 2025

    NPR asks judge to stop CPB from taking money for satellite system away from NPR : NPR

    September 26, 2025

    CITs Outpace Mutual Funds in 2024

    September 26, 2025
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2025 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.