Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SEBI eases entry process for mutual fund AMCs but retains strict checks: What investors should know
    • This SBI fund beat all its active peers with 20%+ SIP returns across 3, 5, and 10 years – Mutual Funds News
    • Direct vs Regular Mutual Funds: What A 1% Expense Ratio Costs You Over 20 Years
    • Morningstar Flags 3 Dividend ETFs to Buy That Can Protect From a Stock Market Decline
    • Silver ETFs surge up to 6% as cooling US yields lift precious metals | Markets News
    • 5 essential tools every seasoned SIP investor should use
    • Why Busy IT Professionals May Benefit From Using a Buyers Agent for Property Investment
    • Lower returns hurt debt fund inflows in April-July 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Funds»Feds don’t have to return money
    Funds

    Feds don’t have to return money

    August 28, 2024



    Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged an HHS rule.

    play

    SCOTUS keeps emergency abortions for those at health risk in Idaho

    The Supreme Court dismissed the emergency abortion case, reversing its January decision to halt the procedures.

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.

    Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court’s ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti’s argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee’s state sovereignty.

    In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to “dictate” eligibility requirements for a federal grant.

    “And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws,” the Monday opinion stated. “Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements.”

    The Tennessee Attorney General’s office has not yet responded to a request for comment.

    The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.

    Inside the lawsuit

    Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren’t legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.

    In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans’ “First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions.”

    After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee’s case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn’t forced to restore its funding stream.

    Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee’s lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.

    Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.

    Latest federal funding fight

    The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.

    In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.

    Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Largecaps for stability, mid and smallcap funds for higher returns | Personal Finance

    August 18, 2026

    Active vs passive mutual funds: Are you really getting more for paying more? – Mutual Funds News

    August 14, 2026

    Money going into UK funds hits five-year high – should you invest?

    August 13, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    Morningstar Flags 3 Dividend ETFs to Buy That Can Protect From a Stock Market Decline

    August 20, 2026

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    SEBI eases entry process for mutual fund AMCs but retains strict checks: What investors should know

    August 20, 2026

    SEBI has revised the application process for mutual fund registration, replacing the earlier multi-form process…

    This SBI fund beat all its active peers with 20%+ SIP returns across 3, 5, and 10 years – Mutual Funds News

    August 20, 2026

    Direct vs Regular Mutual Funds: What A 1% Expense Ratio Costs You Over 20 Years

    August 20, 2026

    Morningstar Flags 3 Dividend ETFs to Buy That Can Protect From a Stock Market Decline

    August 20, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Regarding the Redemption of Private Bonds of ŽŪK

    October 29, 2024

    SIPs now a preferable mode of mutual funds investments by retail investors: Zerodha study

    August 27, 2024

    BFM Bourse : 17h/18h – 05/05

    May 5, 2025
    Our Picks

    SEBI eases entry process for mutual fund AMCs but retains strict checks: What investors should know

    August 20, 2026

    This SBI fund beat all its active peers with 20%+ SIP returns across 3, 5, and 10 years – Mutual Funds News

    August 20, 2026

    Direct vs Regular Mutual Funds: What A 1% Expense Ratio Costs You Over 20 Years

    August 20, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.