Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?
    • CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns
    • Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets
    • Samir Arora’s mutual fund comeback is off to a strong start. The proof? An 18.5% CAGR – Money Insights News
    • How smaller flexi cap funds outperformed larger peers in one year: Key lessons for investors
    • Scheme selection key as mutual fund returns vary widely across categories
    • IRDAI clears investments in private companies, eases infrastructure funding norms
    • Why large-cap funds are losing their alpha edge post-2010: Key factors behind decline and what investors should do
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Funds»Feds don’t have to return money
    Funds

    Feds don’t have to return money

    August 28, 2024



    Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged an HHS rule.

    play

    SCOTUS keeps emergency abortions for those at health risk in Idaho

    The Supreme Court dismissed the emergency abortion case, reversing its January decision to halt the procedures.

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.

    Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court’s ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti’s argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee’s state sovereignty.

    In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to “dictate” eligibility requirements for a federal grant.

    “And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws,” the Monday opinion stated. “Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements.”

    The Tennessee Attorney General’s office has not yet responded to a request for comment.

    The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.

    Inside the lawsuit

    Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren’t legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.

    In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans’ “First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions.”

    After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee’s case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn’t forced to restore its funding stream.

    Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee’s lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.

    Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.

    Latest federal funding fight

    The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.

    In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.

    Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    How smaller flexi cap funds outperformed larger peers in one year: Key lessons for investors

    July 31, 2026

    South Korea cracks down on risky retail funds after tech rout

    July 29, 2026

    Hedge funds grow at the fastest rate ever

    July 26, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    Why exchange-traded funds are a ‘growth engine’ of active management

    November 27, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?

    July 31, 2026

    A person needs higher returns by doing both investment and purchasing insurance. This is where…

    CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns

    July 31, 2026

    Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets

    July 31, 2026

    Samir Arora’s mutual fund comeback is off to a strong start. The proof? An 18.5% CAGR – Money Insights News

    July 31, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Guinness-owner Diageo sells €1.9 billion in euro bonds

    August 29, 2024

    European approval for semi-transparent ETFs sparks debate

    March 9, 2025

    Harbor Funds files for five Lab ETFs targeting private AI companies

    May 22, 2026
    Our Picks

    ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?

    July 31, 2026

    CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns

    July 31, 2026

    Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets

    July 31, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.