Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?
    • CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns
    • Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets
    • Samir Arora’s mutual fund comeback is off to a strong start. The proof? An 18.5% CAGR – Money Insights News
    • How smaller flexi cap funds outperformed larger peers in one year: Key lessons for investors
    • Scheme selection key as mutual fund returns vary widely across categories
    • IRDAI clears investments in private companies, eases infrastructure funding norms
    • Why large-cap funds are losing their alpha edge post-2010: Key factors behind decline and what investors should do
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»FINRA fines firm for bond markups and failure to comply with fair pricing regulations | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Bonds

    FINRA fines firm for bond markups and failure to comply with fair pricing regulations | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

    August 6, 2024


    On July 26, a financial firm accepted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) from FINRA for allegedly charging unfair prices in corporate and municipal bond transactions and for allegedly failing to establish a supervisory system to comply with fair pricing rules. According to the AWC, between April 2020 and June 2023, the firm was found to have charged unfair prices on 98 bond transactions, resulting in customers paying over $112,000 in excess costs in violation of FINRA Rules 2121 and 2010 and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) Rules G-30 and G-17. For example, the AWC alleged that the firm sold 250 bonds with a 1.714 percent mark-up that used an incorrect prevailing market price, which resulted in a customer paying $695 more than if the firm had used the correct prevailing market price. These failures allegedly violated FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010 and MSRB Rule G-27.

     

    Under the AWC, the firm agreed to pay a $125,000 fine, including $110,000 for violations of MSRB rules. The firm will also provide restitution to affected customers of $112,932.02 and must implement a supervisory system that complies with fair pricing regulations.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    AIR BALTIC CORPORATION ASEO-BONDS 2024(24/29) REG.S Bond

    July 29, 2026

    Stocks and bonds see wild ‘Fed day’ swings as Wall Street’s ‘crash cushion’ evaporates

    July 29, 2026

    SBI raises ₹4,691 crore from Tier I bonds to fund business growth

    July 29, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    10 Largest Mutual Funds by AUM | Investing

    October 15, 2024
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?

    July 31, 2026

    A person needs higher returns by doing both investment and purchasing insurance. This is where…

    CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns

    July 31, 2026

    Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets

    July 31, 2026

    Samir Arora’s mutual fund comeback is off to a strong start. The proof? An 18.5% CAGR – Money Insights News

    July 31, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    This mutual fund has turned ₹10,000 monthly SIP into over ₹6.5 lakh in 4 years

    September 3, 2025

    Confidence, knowledge, and community: How women can break the property glass ceiling

    March 9, 2026

    3 Defensive ETFs That Are Quietly Crushing the S&P 500 While Tech Implodes

    March 19, 2026
    Our Picks

    ULIP Plans: Are They Better Than Term Insurance or Mutual Funds?

    July 31, 2026

    CPSE, PSU Bank ETFs emerge as top five year wealth creators; global tech funds also deliver strong returns

    July 31, 2026

    Bloomberg expands ETFs, options and futures electronic trading for Australian markets

    July 31, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.