Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • ₹10 lakh lump sum vs ₹10,000 SIP for 100 months – which built a bigger corpus?
    • Flexicap funds: M&M, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank lead buying; SBI tops sell list in May
    • Rs 5 Lakh Lump Sum vs Rs 5,000 Monthly SIP: Which Creates More Wealth?
    • The FinTech Magazine Guide to Green Bonds
    • India’s monthly SIP book grows nearly ten times in a decade: Report
    • How to evaluate a mutual fund: Factsheet, SIP, expense ratio, fund size | Personal Finance
    • Should You Exit Large Cap Funds as they Underperform Mid and Small Cap Funds – Money Insights News
    • A Guide to Sinkable Bonds: What They Are and Why They Matter
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Local News: Cape Council approves issuance of bonds for West Park Mall project after tense back-and-forth between members (8/20/24)
    Bonds

    Local News: Cape Council approves issuance of bonds for West Park Mall project after tense back-and-forth between members (8/20/24)

    August 20, 2024


    The Cape Girardeau City Council saw tension among members Monday, Aug 19, while meeting to approve the allowing of the Cape Girardeau County Industrial Development Authority Board (IDA) to issue bonds supporting the West Park Mall redevelopment project.

    Previous Southeast Missourian reporting stated River City Centre representative Lucas Haley and John Hansen, managing director of the Westwood, Kansas-based Integra Realty Resources (IRR), had met with the IDA and presented plans for West Park Mall at a July 9 meeting.

    Hansen said to the council at the meeting that what they are doing in approving the bonds is a part of executing what was approved in October in terms of the Tax Increment Financing plan and redevelopment agreement.

    According to the agenda report, “This (approving the action) shall allow for the Authority to issue its Tax Increment and Special District Revenue Bonds (West Park Mall Redevelopment Project), Series 2024 (the “Series 2024 Bonds”), for the purpose of (1) reimbursing the Developer for certain costs relating to the redevelopment of West Park Mall, (2) funding a debt service reserve fund to secure the Series 2024 Bonds, (3) funding capitalized interest on the Series 2024 Bonds, and (4) paying the costs of issuance of the Series 2024 Bonds.”

    The vote passed 4 to 2 with Ward 2 Councilwoman Tameka Randle and Ward 5 Councilman Rhett Pierce voting “no”, and Ward 1 Councilman Dan Presson being absent.

    Before the vote took place, Randle said she had a statement about the West Park Mall development. Randle said she didn’t want to “mince words” as she called the action of approving the bond as “disastrous” and “detrimental”.

    “If this bond is approved by the council, we will continue to pad the pockets of million-dollar private developers’ accounts while our city community and citizens lose their hard-earned dollars,” Randle said. “If council approves this reckless request that’s ongoing, and we as a council definitely identify as having our party screwed up and our citizens to lose faith in us as leaders. So I’ve asked all the questions I have, my mind has not changed, and the direction that we will go in to approve this would not be good for the city. Allowing the requesting for asking taxpayer dollars is ridiculous. … We just approved for regular, hard-working people to pay extra in water, but we got many dollars to help them all, and so that’s where I stand with that.”

    After Randle described the action as a “disservice” to the community, Mayor Stacy Kinder began to respond and said that she thought that was a mischaracterization of the project. Randle said to Kinder, to not tell her about her character.

    Randle told Kinder to share her point of view but not to disregard what she just stated.

    Kinder responded and said, “I’m trying.”

    Kinder said that’s her opinion and then tried to respond to what Randle said in her statement.

    Randle responded and said Kinder was not an “expert to critique” what she stated. Randle said Kinder should share her comments and see whether everyone is “aligned” with her on the council.

    “These things (concerning West Park Mall) have been approved six to one for the past year,” Kinder said.

    “Well, we still got to vote, and we got new council members,” Randle said.

    After the meeting, Kinder said to the Southeast Missourian that she took issue with what Randle said since Kinder thought Randle implied tax dollars gathered from the city were being paid to the developers.

    “In my mind, that sounded like she was saying, ‘We have money right now that we are taking from the city budget and giving to the mall project.’ And that is false. The developers and all of these agreements are only going to use new tax dollars that are generated from their new sales at the mall or from their increased property values, as the property is improved upon,” Kinder said.

    After the meeting, Pierce said part of the reason for saying no to the vote issue was that the outlying buildings were not being built yet.

    “I feel that there is a substantial or significant issue with the outlying buildings not being able to be built and if that’s not done, I don’t see where the mall is just going to magically be redesigned and bring in that type of revenue,” Pierce said.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    The FinTech Magazine Guide to Green Bonds

    June 13, 2026

    A Guide to Sinkable Bonds: What They Are and Why They Matter

    June 12, 2026

    Green bonds & NRI money may power Kerala’s high-speed rail plan

    June 12, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    ₹10 lakh lump sum vs ₹10,000 SIP for 100 months – which built a bigger corpus?

    June 13, 2026

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    SIP

    ₹10 lakh lump sum vs ₹10,000 SIP for 100 months – which built a bigger corpus?

    June 13, 2026

    Many investors wonder whether investing a large amount upfront or spreading the same investment through…

    Flexicap funds: M&M, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank lead buying; SBI tops sell list in May

    June 13, 2026

    Rs 5 Lakh Lump Sum vs Rs 5,000 Monthly SIP: Which Creates More Wealth?

    June 13, 2026

    The FinTech Magazine Guide to Green Bonds

    June 13, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    U.S. Ether (ETH) Spot ETFs See Net Withdrawals for 11th Straight Day

    March 20, 2025

    From Luxury Watches To Art And Handbags

    October 27, 2024

    Gold ETFs vs gold mutual funds: Key differences in returns, costs, taxation and SIPs

    May 27, 2026
    Our Picks

    ₹10 lakh lump sum vs ₹10,000 SIP for 100 months – which built a bigger corpus?

    June 13, 2026

    Flexicap funds: M&M, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank lead buying; SBI tops sell list in May

    June 13, 2026

    Rs 5 Lakh Lump Sum vs Rs 5,000 Monthly SIP: Which Creates More Wealth?

    June 13, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.