Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Bitcoin ETFs Lose Accumulation Momentum Despite Short-Term Inflow Spikes
    • Small-Cap ETFs: ISCB Outperforms, but SPSM Yields More
    • 2 Vanguard Funds That Can Turn $450 Per Month Into $1 Million in 30 Years
    • NYC may reinvest in Israel bonds in defiance of mayor Mamdani’s stance
    • Private credit investors pull $7bn from Wall Street’s biggest funds
    • Debt mutual funds v/s tax-free bonds: Which is safer?
    • Top Mutual Funds for 2026 As Per Perplexity AI Picks
    • Active ETFs Face New Cost Pressure as Schwab Weighs Distribution Fees: JPM – ARK Innovation ETF (BATS:ARKK), PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund Exchange-Traded Fund (NYSE:BOND)
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Palos Verdes Peninsula School District shouldn’t be asking voters for a nearly $300 million bond – Daily Breeze
    Bonds

    Palos Verdes Peninsula School District shouldn’t be asking voters for a nearly $300 million bond – Daily Breeze

    October 14, 2024


    Measure SOS is a school bond on the ballot for voters in Palos Verdes. It would allow the Palos Verdes Peninsula School District to take on a debt of $297,800,000. The money would be used for repairs and updates to facilities. This debt would be repaid through an annual tax to all property owners in Palos Verdes over the next 20-27 years. Including interest, the total cost to local taxpayers would be close to half-a-billion dollars.

    How much would this bond cost each homeowner? Although the district claims a cost of $300 per one million of assessed valuation, this is an assumption based on a lot of variables. Nothing is guaranteed. The bond resolution actually contains the following disclaimer, “Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District.”

    Apparently, the maintenance on school buildings has been deferred to the point of crisis. However, as Julie Hamill mentioned in her most recent newsletter, in 2022 while she was campaigning for a seat on the school board, the district claimed that it “had more money than it knew what to do with”.

    At that time the school board spent time brainstorming about how to spend all the extra money. If facilities are at crisis level in 2024, then in 2022 the only discussion should have been: the buildings are about to fall to the ground, and every spare dollar must be put towards infrastructure. However, the buildings were not prioritized and the money was spent elsewhere.

    Also, let’s remember that in 2021 the district received a windfall of about $15,000,000 which could have been used to update the HVAC systems, but was instead used to purchase other items such as Social/Emotional learning curriculum.

    The LCFF (Local Control Funding Formula) is often pointed out as the source of the district’s financial problems. While it is true that under the current system Palos Verdes receives less per student than other districts, remember, this formula only went into effect in 2013. Prior to that time the district also deferred maintenance until the problems were extreme and could be used as leverage to promote a bond measure. In fact, we are still paying off debt on three bonds that were passed before 2013 (Measures R, K and S).

    In 2014 the voters in Palos Verdes passed Measure M, which is a permanent parcel tax on each property in the district. It has no sunset and increases every year. It was promoted to the community as a means to eliminate the need for future bonds. Although this income can be used for maintaining facilities, it has been directed elsewhere, and two bonds for improvements to facilities have been on the ballot since the adoption of Measure M. One possible solution would be to direct the funds from Measure M towards facilities.

    How will the district make the necessary repairs if Measure SOS does not pass? It is a question of fiscal responsibility. Every family and business must evaluate needs versus wants within a given budget. School facilities have not been prioritized by the district, so money has been spent in other areas.

    The solution to deferred maintenance is not a massive and unpredictable debt to be shouldered by property owners. The district simply needs to prioritize school buildings and make financial decisions accordingly. They may find themselves in a tough spot right now, but that is not the problem of ordinary people who do not use the public schools, which amounts to at least 75% of the population in Palos Verdes.

    The unrestricted annual income for PVPUSD is about $150,000,000 per year with additional income in restricted funds. Local control allows the unrestricted funds to be spent at the discretion of the School Board, with only 3% held in reserve. The other 97% is available.

    We must insist the public schools operate within their means.

    Charity Malin is a resident and property owner in Palos Verdes.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    NYC may reinvest in Israel bonds in defiance of mayor Mamdani’s stance

    January 17, 2026

    Lebanon’s bonds rally on bets that Iran’s influence could be weakened

    January 15, 2026

    AI bonds could devour credit markets. Let stock investors take the risk.

    January 15, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    NYC may reinvest in Israel bonds in defiance of mayor Mamdani’s stance

    January 17, 2026
    Don't Miss
    ETFs

    Bitcoin ETFs Lose Accumulation Momentum Despite Short-Term Inflow Spikes

    January 17, 2026

    TLDR: Bitcoin ETF holdings have moved sideways since early 2025, signaling stagnation rather than renewed…

    Small-Cap ETFs: ISCB Outperforms, but SPSM Yields More

    January 17, 2026

    2 Vanguard Funds That Can Turn $450 Per Month Into $1 Million in 30 Years

    January 17, 2026

    NYC may reinvest in Israel bonds in defiance of mayor Mamdani’s stance

    January 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Investing in India’s chip revolution: Top semiconductor mutual funds – Money Insights News

    September 20, 2025

    Samara Asset Group plans to issue $32.8m bonds to boost its Bitcoin holdings

    October 14, 2024

    SIP Trunking Services Market Trends and Regional Analysis

    July 22, 2024
    Our Picks

    Bitcoin ETFs Lose Accumulation Momentum Despite Short-Term Inflow Spikes

    January 17, 2026

    Small-Cap ETFs: ISCB Outperforms, but SPSM Yields More

    January 17, 2026

    2 Vanguard Funds That Can Turn $450 Per Month Into $1 Million in 30 Years

    January 17, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.