Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Top ETFs to Invest in 2026
    • Understanding Mutual Fund Yield: Calculation, Benefits, and Examples
    • Evaluating Mutual Fund Risk-Return Tradeoffs: Key Metrics
    • XRP ETFs see steady inflows as total assets hit $1.2B
    • Gold ETFs Boom: GLD Is Larger in Size But AAAU Is More Affordable
    • ICICI Prudential MF enters SIF space with equity ex top 100, hybrid long short funds
    • Portfolio Stability With Dividend Yield Funds
    • A practical guide to small-cap fund investing
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»The first AABLE Bail Bonds trial is over in Houston. Here are 3 things it revealed.
    Bonds

    The first AABLE Bail Bonds trial is over in Houston. Here are 3 things it revealed.

    October 6, 2025


    Inside a mostly empty courtroom Monday morning, attorneys delivered closing arguments in the first bench trial for people accused of conspiring with Houston’s AABLE Bail Bonds to spring men charged with murder and other crimes from jail.

    Last year, more than 50 people were arrested and accused of participating in a conspiracy to use fraudulent documents to get people with high bail amounts out of jail. The Department of Justice accused most of the people in the indictment of defrauding an insurance company, Financial Casualty & Surety, the underwriter for bonds written by AABLE.

    MORE ON HOUSTONCHRONICLE.COM: Inside a Houston bail company’s alleged fraud scheme that helped get murder suspects out of jail

    The three people on trial – James Bateson, Kamaiga Gholar and Katherine O’Brien – are all accused of acting as straw cosigners to get criminal defendants out of jail using AABLE’s services. Here’s what was revealed during the trial:

    Not every co-signer acted the same way

    The indictment handed up last year accuses the alleged co-signers of committing the same crime: putting their names on documents that showed they earned more money than they truly did.

    Testimony during the trial showed a wide variance in how the co-signers acted.

    Bateson is accused of sharing false information about himself, claiming that he worked for a company that didn’t exist, prosecutors said. He showed up at AABLE’s offices and turned over his driver’s license for the company’s files. Prosecutors alleged Bateson was paid $100 to help bond out a defendant, James Palladina, in April 2021.

    Gholar went to AABLE’s office and presented truthful information about herself. She’s accused of passing along false information about other people she knew to obtain a bond for a defendant named Nicholas Yoder. During testimony, Gholar said she didn’t know the information that other people gave her was false.

    “He was asking me to help him” Gholar said. “I like putting smiles on people’s faces and turning their day around. Anything I can do, I’m just helpful. I like being a big help to people.”

    Prosecutors, however, played phone recordings where Gholar talked about disguising her handwriting in bond documents and delaying the timing of when she sent information to avoid suspicion.

    O’Brien used other people’s personal information with their knowledge, including the Social Security number of a woman she met while working in a job-training program, to bond out her then-boyfriend, Roemello Burros, according to prosecutors. O’Brien argued that she was a victim of abuse and committed the crime under duress. After he was bonded out, Burros was convicted of sex trafficking. O’Brien was one of his victims, according to her attorneys.

    AABLE employees guided the scheme, according to testimony

    Testimony during the weeklong trial revealed more details about how AABLE employees allegedly worked with criminal defendants to arrange the fraudulent documents.

    Prosecutors played a jailhouse phone call between Yoder, Gholar’s friend, and Mary Brown, an AABLE employee, in which Brown coached him on how many co-signers he needed and what kind of information they should report.

    An audio recording presented by prosecutors showed Brown charging extra money to get around information verification checks required by AABLE’s insurer.

    In another part of the trial, Gholar said that she was directed by another employee, Oscar Wattel, to seek out fake co-signers after she turned in truthful information.

    Both Brown and Wattel were charged in the AABLE indictment. Court records show Brown asked for a court date to be set to enter a guilty plea, but no date has been set.

    Still unclear is what role AABLE’s owner, Sheba Muharib, may have played in the conspiracy. The federal indictment charged Muharib with knowingly allowing Wattel to work for her despite a previous conviction for insurance fraud. Unlike Brown and Wattel, there wasn’t any testimony during the trial to link Muharib directly with AABLE customers.

    Who was hurt?

    One of the more complicated arguments of the case is who exactly was hurt by the scheme. According to the indictment, the victim is Financial Casualty & Surety, the insurer who backed AABLE’s bonds in case a bond was forfeited.

    Prosecutors acknowledged that none of the bonds AABLE arranged were forfeited. The insurer didn’t lose any money because of the release of the 11 men because they all returned to court as they were supposed to.

    But it’s a crime to force an insurer to unknowingly risk money, prosecutors said.

    “FCS put its money on the line, its property on the line, when it issued surety bonds for these defendants who were released on the basis of false information,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephanie Bauman said.

    Ken Good, an attorney who represents FCS, testified that AABLE’s collapse hurt the company. FCS has lost between $1.5 million and $2 million since AABLE’s closure, Good said. The losses were largely because of forfeited bonds agreed to by AABLE that FCS had to pay, he said.

    Good testified that AABLE was a “house of cards” that worked to evade internal checks on its financial health that might have caught the scheme while it was underway.

    “We normally have red flags that we look for that show that an agency’s under stress,” Good said. “We didn’t see any of those red flags here, and we lost because of fraud.”

    What’s next in the AABLE case

    U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal didn’t immediately issue a decision on Bateson, Gholar and O’Brien’s cases following closing arguments Monday morning. A written decision is expected sometime in the future.

    If they are convicted, the trio will join the list of AABLE defendants waiting to be sentenced for their role in the conspiracy. As of Monday, 20 of the 53 people named in the indictment had signed plea agreements. The first sentence related to the case is scheduled to be handed down on Wednesday.

    The defendants who have not pleaded and didn’t participate in the bench trial are currently scheduled to begin their jury trial Nov. 10.

    This article originally published at The first AABLE Bail Bonds trial is over in Houston. Here are 3 things it revealed..



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    How to Calculate Convexity Adjustment in Bonds, with Formulas

    December 19, 2025

    Understanding Bullet Loans and Bonds: Key Concepts Explained

    December 19, 2025

    Hong Kong Issues One Of The Biggest Digital Green Bonds

    December 19, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    Top ETFs to Invest in 2026

    December 21, 2025

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    ETFs

    Top ETFs to Invest in 2026

    December 21, 2025

    1. What makes ETFs a suitable investment option for long-term goals like 2026 and beyond?ETFs…

    Understanding Mutual Fund Yield: Calculation, Benefits, and Examples

    December 20, 2025

    Evaluating Mutual Fund Risk-Return Tradeoffs: Key Metrics

    December 20, 2025

    XRP ETFs see steady inflows as total assets hit $1.2B

    December 20, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Crypto Trading Surges Among Hedge Funds

    October 14, 2024

    SIP Calculation: How Soon Will Rs 1,000 Per Month Turn Into Rs 2 Lakh? | Savings and Investments News

    August 20, 2025

    Vanguard Brokerage Account 2024 Review

    July 18, 2024
    Our Picks

    Top ETFs to Invest in 2026

    December 21, 2025

    Understanding Mutual Fund Yield: Calculation, Benefits, and Examples

    December 20, 2025

    Evaluating Mutual Fund Risk-Return Tradeoffs: Key Metrics

    December 20, 2025
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2025 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.