Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Comparing Performance and Checking Dividends—Why S&P 500 and Mutual Fund Figures Differ|HIRO
    • Mutual fund industry must shift from access to investor outcomes: Experts
    • Will Canadians’ faith in mutual funds survive total cost reporting?
    • US spot Ethereum ETFs log record 23-day net outflow streak
    • Investors Pull $643 Million From Bitcoin ETFs After the Biggest Crypto Hack in History
    • Can’t the 94 trillion yen in ETFs held by the Bank of Japan be distributed to the public? Thinking about Japan’s asset formation and monetary policy from the idea of 760,000 yen per person
    • Spot Bitcoin ETFs shed $643 million in a day as Ethereum funds lose $156 million
    • SEBI makes direct mutual fund plans default, pushes transparency on costs and commissions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»ETFs»SEC backtracks on REX-Osprey staked ETFs
    ETFs

    SEC backtracks on REX-Osprey staked ETFs

    May 31, 2025


    The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) responded to the effective registration amendment for Solana (SOL) and Ether (ETH) staked exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from ETF provider REX Financial and asset management firm Osprey Funds, raising concern that both investment vehicles do not qualify as ETFs due to their unique structures.

    According to a recent report from Bloomberg, the regulators say the c-corp business structure used in the funds, which is incredibly rare for ETFs, conflicts with the 6C-11 rule, colloquially known as “the ETF rule.” This regulation legally designates the types of corporate structures appropriate for exchange-traded funds. The SEC wrote in a May 30 letter:

    “As we have communicated to you on several occasions, Commission staff continues to have unresolved questions about whether the Funds, if structured and operated as proposed, would be able to meet the definition of ‘investment company’ under the Investment Company Act.”  

    “Disclosures in the registration statement regarding the Funds’ status as investment companies may be potentially misleading,” the letter continued.

    SEC, Staking, ETF
    SEC responds to the REX-Osprey staking ETF filings with concern over the business structure of the ETFs. Source: SEC

    Despite the minor setback, analysts are optimistic that the ETF issuers and the SEC will reach an agreement. “REX lawyers say they can work it out,” Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas wrote in a May 31 X post. “Issuers are pushing the envelope hard in an effort to get first to market,” the analyst continued.

    Crypto investors and traders continue closely monitoring the approval of altcoin and staking ETFs in the United States, as the listing of these investment vehicles is expected to bring fresh liquidity from the traditional financial markets into crypto.

    Related: Crypto industry urges SEC to clarify staking stance

    SEC delays staking ETF decision despite recent guidance

    Despite the SEC issuing recent guidance that crypto staking does not violate securities laws and does not fall under the purview of securities transactions, the SEC continues to delay the decision on staked and altcoin ETFs.

    According to Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, the delays were expected and are not out of the norm.

    “Almost all of these filings have final due dates in October,” Seyffart wrote, adding that it is uncommon for ETF applications to be approved so early.

    Magazine: Bitcoin ETFs make Coinbase a ‘honeypot’ for hackers and governments: Trezor CEO