Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Mutual Funds: SIP Contributions Nearly Hit Rs 3 Lakh Crore, AUM Crosses Rs 65 Lakh Mark
    • Activity of investment in mutual funds cannot be classified as exempted service hence rule 6 of CCR not applicable
    • MFs in April 2025: Equity fund inflows decline, SIPs soar to record levels
    • SOL Global Investments annonce un investissement stratégique de 1 million de dollars américains dans McQueen Labs
    • April net equity inflows slip to 1-year lows; small and midcaps see higher inflows Vs large caps: AMFI data – Money News
    • Equity mutual fund inflows dip 3.2% in April; largecap funds buck the trend
    • Langham Hospitality Investments Limited approuve la distribution finale pour l’exercice clos le 31 décembre 2024
    • Dubai Investments reports 52% increase in Q1 2025 profit before tax to AED185mln
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»ETFs»USHY: A Low-Fee Junk Bond ETF (BATS:USHY)
    ETFs

    USHY: A Low-Fee Junk Bond ETF (BATS:USHY)

    August 14, 2024


    Document with title junk bond on a table. Selective focus.

    designer491

    Strategy

    iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BATS:USHY) started investing operations on 10/25/2017 and tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. It has 1874 holdings, a 12-month trailing yield of 6.71%, a 30-day SEC yield of 7.56% and an expense ratio of 0.08%. Distributions are paid monthly. Based on assets under management, USHY is the largest ETF in high yield corporate bonds (often referred to as “junk bonds”), shortly ahead of iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK).

    As described by iShares in the prospectus,

    The Underlying Index is designed to provide a broad representation of the U.S. dollar-denominated high yield corporate bond market. The Underlying Index is a modified market value-weighted index with a cap on each issuer of 2%.

    Eligible securities must have at least $250 million of outstanding face value, an original maturity date of at least 18 months and at least one year to maturity. Issuers must have an average rating below investment grade and be headquartered in a list of 28 developed countries. The portfolio turnover rate in the most recent fiscal year was 13%.

    Portfolio

    The heaviest sectors in the portfolio are consumer discretionary and industrials, almost on par at about 20% of asset value. Communication, energy, and consumer staples are between 12% and 14%. Other sectors are below 10%.

    Sector breakdown in %

    Sector breakdown in % (Chart: author; data: iShares)

    About 50% of asset value is invested in debt with a BB rating, meaning the fund has a tilt to less risky junk bonds (the upper rating BBB is investment grade).

    Quality breakdown in %

    Quality breakdown in % (Chart: author; data: iShares)

    About 51% of assets have maturity of between 3 and 5 years. The portfolio’s weighted average maturity is 4.36 years.

    Maturity breakdown in %

    Maturity breakdown in % (Chart: author; data: iShares)

    The next table lists the top 10 issuers, which represent 9.5% of asset value. The portfolio is well-diversified and risks related to individual companies are low.

    Name

    Common stock

    Weight%

    CCO HOLDINGS LLC

    1.93

    TRANSDIGM INC

    TDG

    1.14

    TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

    THC

    0.94

    VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC

    0.93

    CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC

    CYH

    0.82

    CSC HOLDINGS LLC

    0.79

    CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP INC

    0.77

    CARNIVAL CORP

    CCL

    0.77

    ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD

    RCL

    0.71

    MEDLINE BORROWER LP

    0.65

    Performance

    USHY has a total return close to 31% since its inception in October 2017:

    USHY total return

    USHY total return (Seeking Alpha)

    However, the share price has lost 12% (excluding distributions). While it has been paying high distributions, the fund has suffered a loss in capital. The decay is amplified by the cumulative inflation: about 27% since November 2017, based on the Consumer Price Index.

    USHY price return

    USHY price return (Seeking Alpha)

    The annual sum of distributions was close to flat from 2018 to 2023, as reported on the next chart. Measured in inflation-adjusted value, it represents a loss of income stream over 20% in 5 years for shareholders.

    USHY distribution history

    USHY distribution history (Seeking Alpha)

    The next table compares characteristics of HYG and its closest competitors HYG and JNK, both passively managed ETFs tracking different indexes in the same asset category.

    USHY

    HYG

    JNK

    Inception

    10/25/2017

    4/4/2007

    11/28/2007

    Expense Ratio

    0.08%

    0.49%

    0.40%

    AUM

    $15.93B

    $15.25B

    $8.17B

    Avg Daily Volume

    $282.91M

    $2.77B

    $325.43M

    Turnover

    13.00%

    11.00%

    28.00%

    Div. Yield TTM

    6.78%

    5.92%

    6.62%

    Div. Growth 5 Yr CAGR

    -0.15%

    -0.06%

    0.57%

    USHY is the largest of these funds in assets and has the cheapest expense ratio. It is the least liquid in dollar volume, though. The next chart plots total returns, starting on 11/1/2017 to match all inception dates. USHY is the best performer, while HYG and JNK are almost tied.

    USHY vs HYG, JNK

    USHY vs HYG, JNK (Seeking Alpha)

    USHY vs. strategy ETFs

    The next table compares characteristics of USHY and five high-yield corporate bond ETFs intending to improve the risk-adjusted performance with specific rules:

    • iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG)
    • VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL)
    • First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS)
    • FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV)
    • Invesco Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (PHB).

    USHY

    SHYG

    ANGL

    HYLS

    HYGV

    PHB

    Inception

    10/25/2017

    10/15/2013

    4/10/2012

    2/25/2013

    7/17/2018

    11/15/2007

    Expense Ratio

    0.08%

    0.30%

    0.25%

    1.02%

    0.37%

    0.50%

    AUM

    $15.93B

    $6.18B

    $2.96B

    $1.44B

    $1.39B

    $645.20M

    Avg Daily Volume

    $282.91M

    $56.52M

    $34.67M

    $6.52M

    $8.78M

    $2.64M

    Holdings

    1874

    1052

    127

    332

    1003

    239

    Turnover

    13.00%

    26.00%

    31.00%

    29.00%

    167.00%

    31.00%

    Div. Yield TTM

    6.78%

    6.64%

    5.94%

    6.38%

    8.77%

    5.33%

    Div. Growth 5 Yr CAGR

    -0.15%

    1.43%

    1.09%

    -0.15%

    -4.52%

    4.17%

    Once again, USHY has the lowest expense ratio. The next chart plots total returns, starting on 7/23/2018 to match all inception dates. USHY is the second-best performer, significantly lagging the “fallen angels” fund, which invests in debt of companies that lost their investment grade rating.

    USHY vs. Competitors since 7/23/2018

    USHY vs. Competitors since 7/23/2018 (Seeking Alpha)

    Takeaway

    iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF is the largest “junk bond” ETF. USHY has an attractive yield, but its price has lost 12% since 2017 and distributions have not kept pace with inflation. Nonetheless, USHY has performed quite well compared to competitors and has a lower fee. However, it has been lagging fallen angel ETFs like VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). High-yield bond ETFs don’t look very compelling as long-term investments, but they may be very useful in tactical asset allocation strategies switching between bond categories.

    Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Gold ETFs Record Strongest Inflows Since 2022, Says World Gold Council

    May 8, 2025

    Why you should avoid leveraged ETFs

    May 8, 2025

    les paris haussiers et les entrées dans les ETF soutiennent la hause

    May 8, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    SOL Global Investments annonce un investissement stratégique de 1 million de dollars américains dans McQueen Labs

    May 9, 2025

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    The Evolution of Art and Art Investments: A Historical Perspective on Fruitful Returns and Wealth Management

    August 21, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Mutual Funds: SIP Contributions Nearly Hit Rs 3 Lakh Crore, AUM Crosses Rs 65 Lakh Mark

    May 9, 2025

    Mutual Funds Growth Story: India’s mutual fund industry has undergone massive transformation, especially with Asset…

    Activity of investment in mutual funds cannot be classified as exempted service hence rule 6 of CCR not applicable

    May 9, 2025

    MFs in April 2025: Equity fund inflows decline, SIPs soar to record levels

    May 9, 2025

    SOL Global Investments annonce un investissement stratégique de 1 million de dollars américains dans McQueen Labs

    May 9, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    US bonds in turmoil – what’s really at play?

    October 30, 2024

    SIA receives $65 million in tax abatements from Lafayette City Council

    June 4, 2024

    The newest fad in mutual fund multiverse: Sectoral Funds. Here’s why you should not over-invest in them

    October 11, 2024
    Our Picks

    Mutual Funds: SIP Contributions Nearly Hit Rs 3 Lakh Crore, AUM Crosses Rs 65 Lakh Mark

    May 9, 2025

    Activity of investment in mutual funds cannot be classified as exempted service hence rule 6 of CCR not applicable

    May 9, 2025

    MFs in April 2025: Equity fund inflows decline, SIPs soar to record levels

    May 9, 2025
    Most Popular

    ₹1 lakh investment in these 2 ELSS mutual funds at launch would have grown to over ₹5 lakh. Check details

    April 25, 2025

    ZIG, BUZZ, NANC, and KRUZ

    October 11, 2024

    Zerodha’s Nithin Kamath And Capital Minds’ Deepak Shenoy On Why ETFs Are Preferred In US

    February 20, 2025
    © 2025 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.