Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • What are AT1 bonds? Features, risks, and how they differ from regular bonds
    • Want to start SIP for mutual fund? Here’s a step-by-step guide for how to make the most of your investment
    • Comparing Bond ETFs: Vanguard’s BSV vs. iShares’ IGSB
    • Ignore Hormuz – 3 Energy ETFs That Can Rally No Matter What Happens
    • Spot, ETFs, or Futures: High-Potential Crypto Investment Option
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund declares IDCW payout: What does the option mean? Check date, payout, eligibility & more
    • How to earn a tax-free second income from UK property without purchasing a buy-to-let
    • Best Mutual Funds to Invest in April 2026: Top 10 Expert Picks
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Funds»Mass. officials criticize Trump administration over $6.9 million cut from public safety funds
    Funds

    Mass. officials criticize Trump administration over $6.9 million cut from public safety funds

    October 1, 2025


    Campbell said in a separate statement Wednesday that she will “keep fighting in court for a permanent block on the Trump Administration’s unlawful attempt to take this critical funding away from our state.”

    “There is nothing more important than the safety and security of our residents, and this order is key to ensuring Massachusetts can prepare for and respond to natural disasters, cyberattacks, and other emergencies as our case continues,” she said.

    In Rhode Island, state Attorney General Peter F. Neronha said in a statement that “federal emergency funding cannot be held hostage from states who are rightfully resisting the President’s unlawful attempts to force them to do his bidding.”

    The US Department of Homeland Security didn’t respond Wednesday to requests for comment.

    The funding at stake comes from the Homeland Security Grant Program, which provides about $1 billion to states.

    Over the summer, Massachusetts was notified that it would receive $22.2 million in grant funding, but on Saturday state officials received word that nearly $7 million had been reallocated. The reallocation left Massachusetts with $15.3 million in grant funding, while states like Missouri and Texas received large boosts in their allotments, according to the complaint by the 12 states that sued over the reallocated funding.

    The other states in the lawsuit are Illinois, New Jersey, California, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Minnesota, New York, Vermont, and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia.

    In a statement on Tuesday, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey criticized the funding cut.

    “President Trump is playing politics with our public safety, and he’s using these funding cuts to punish those who disagree with him,” she said. “He needs to restore the funding that we are owed.”

    The grant funding is distributed across Massachusetts through five regional advisory councils, which use the money to pay for training, equipment, and other measures intended to help protect the public from acts of terrorism or other disasters.

    If Massachusetts loses the nearly $7 million that the Trump administration wants to reallocate, funding for the Metro Boston Region would take the biggest hit — more than $4.1 million, according to state figures.

    The cut would eliminate all funding for a regional SWAT team, a longstanding effort to improve public safety communications, a regional camera system, and a gunshot detection service, the state said.

    Funding for training and equipment to protect the Port of Boston would be cut by more than $322,124, a 62 percent reduction, the figures show.

    The cuts would also wipe out most of the funding for a $1.8 million grant program to help state agencies respond to a terror attack or other disaster.

    In the central part of the state, the funding cuts would eliminate funding that helps pay for the regional homeland security council and a laser scanner system that can be used in crime scene investigations.

    Funding for technical rescue teams in that part of the state would be reduced to $8,862, a cut of 90 percent.

    Dudley Fire Chief Dean Kochanowski, the chairperson of the Central Region Homeland Security Council, said the public safety cuts make no sense.

    “They are cutting the things they wanted,” he said Wednesday.

    The grant funding also pays for training and equipment to prepare emergency responders to handle active shooter incidents, provide security during elections, and set up emergency shelters.

    There is constant demand for training in the areas of technical rescue and active shooter response because of turnover among emergency responders, said Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Grady of the Berkshire County Sheriff’s Department.

    Grady leads the Western Region Homeland Security Advisory Council.

    “It will always be a necessary requirement,” he said Wednesday. “We will have to continue the process of training them to the same level.”

    In Rhode Island, the state received the federal funding it expected, a total of more than $7.3 million, though the Trump administration said the sum must be spent in a year, instead of three. That meant the state’s emergency management agency would have to make last-minute changes to its emergency budget — and would end up losing millions that it couldn’t spend.

    The fight over funding from the federal Homeland Security Grant Program dates to Trump’s Inauguration Day when he signed an executive order directing DHS to withhold money from “sanctuary” jurisdictions, or places where local officials refrain from getting involved with immigration enforcement.

    As the Trump administration worked to carry out the order, 20 states and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit in May, challenging the constitutionally of making state cooperation in immigration enforcement a condition of grant funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a component of DHS.

    Last week, a federal judge in Rhode Island handling that case ruled in favor of the states and prohibited the federal government from requiring states to assist with immigration enforcement in order to be eligible for FEMA grants.

    Following the ruling, the Trump administration notified states over the weekend of reallocated funding for the homeland security grants.

    Amanda Milkovits of the Globe staff contributed to this report.


    Nick Stoico can be reached at nick.stoico@globe.com. Laura Crimaldi can be reached at laura.crimaldi@globe.com. Follow her @lauracrimaldi.





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Child trust funds: a windfall at 18 – but what should you do next? | Child trust funds

    April 10, 2026

    Funds to buy in turbulent times

    April 10, 2026

    Debt funds see ₹2.94 lakh crore outflows in March amid year-end liquidity shift

    April 10, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    What are AT1 bonds? Features, risks, and how they differ from regular bonds

    April 12, 2026

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Bonds

    What are AT1 bonds? Features, risks, and how they differ from regular bonds

    April 12, 2026

    After the financial crisis of 2008, all banks were mandated to protect the capital against…

    Want to start SIP for mutual fund? Here’s a step-by-step guide for how to make the most of your investment

    April 12, 2026

    Comparing Bond ETFs: Vanguard’s BSV vs. iShares’ IGSB

    April 12, 2026

    Ignore Hormuz – 3 Energy ETFs That Can Rally No Matter What Happens

    April 12, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    European ETFs post record $93bn inflows as investors shun US funds

    May 2, 2025

    Vanguard will open trading access to crypto ETFs and funds starting tomorrow

    December 1, 2025

    Premium Bonds ‘tax liability’ warning over £500 limit

    April 8, 2026
    Our Picks

    What are AT1 bonds? Features, risks, and how they differ from regular bonds

    April 12, 2026

    Want to start SIP for mutual fund? Here’s a step-by-step guide for how to make the most of your investment

    April 12, 2026

    Comparing Bond ETFs: Vanguard’s BSV vs. iShares’ IGSB

    April 12, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.