Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • A Fund That Buys Recent IPO Stocks: Should You Invest?
    • Morgan Wallen walks out with Barry Bonds, Steve Young at Santa Clara concert
    • Zee Business Mutual Fund Awards 2025: From ICICI to SBI, major AMCs shine as industry celebrates Rs 75 lakh crore milestone
    • Back to basics: Multi-factor mutual funds in India
    • Zee Business Mutual Fund Awards 2025: Industry leaders, top fund houses honoured across 9 categories
    • Private-credit ETFs are here. Why your -2-
    • Best mutual Fund types for retirement planning – Money Insights News
    • Spot Bitcoin ETFs See $812M Outflow as Ether ETFs Break 20-Day Inflow Streak
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Investments»SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors
    Investments

    SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors

    October 31, 2024


    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors LLC.

    The SEC complaint, seen by FX News Group, was submitted at the Florida Southern District Court on October 30, 2024.

    From May 2020 to at least January 2024, Dusan Varga and his company Pannon Investment Advisors LLC, raised approximately $1.6 million from at least 20 investors, through a series of unregistered and fraudulent offerings.

    The defendants solicited investments in securities through investment agreements to invest in the Pannon Risk-Managed Income Fund, a purported investment fund managed by the defendants. Defendants misrepresented that the Pannon Fund traded covered stock options to generate high income while managing downside risk, while promising investors fixed returns in the form of dividends of 3% or 4% a month.

    The defendants used a combination of phone calls, text messages, WhatsApp messages, emails, in-person meetings, Zoom meetings, and written documents to solicit investors.

    Defendants also solicited investors via a referral program under which they paid referral fees to existing investors for referring new investors to invest in the Pannon Fund, Defendants’ client.

    Further, the defendants made numerous material misrepresentations about the use of investor and client funds, the profitability of Pannon’s trading, Varga’s purported background as a registered representative of a broker-dealer, and the safety of investing with the Pannon Fund. For example, Defendants falsely represented to investors that, upon their demand, investors could receive a full return of their principal funds within a few business days and that investors’ principal funds were matched in an escrow account to ensure the liquidity of their investments.

    In reality, there was no escrow account, the defendants made Ponzi-like payments to investors, and Varga misappropriated and commingled investor and client funds in his own personal bank and brokerage accounts.

    Rather than using investor and client funds to consistently trade covered stock options as promised to investors, Defendants often engaged in riskier, uncovered options trading that ultimately resulted in aggregate trading losses of over $200,000.

    The scheme unraveled during the last quarter of 2023, when Varga and Pannon stopped making dividend payments to investors, initially blaming the delay in payment on processing issues with online bill pay services and banks. Despite numerous redemption requests by investors, Varga and Pannon have failed to return investors’ principal funds.

    The SEC accuses the defendants of violation of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c) and 77q(a)], and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]. Varga and Pannon also violated Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1), (2), and (4) and 17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8)] and breach of the fiduciary duties they owed to their advisory client, the Pannon Fund.

    The Commission seeks injunctive relief, as well as disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against the defendants. The Commission also seeks an order imposing an officer and director bar against Varga.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Hochul blames ‘lack of investments’ for MTA’s hellish service meltdowns, even as bloated transit agency eyes fare hike to $3

    August 1, 2025

    Kazakhstan Quadruples Environmental Investments in First Half of 2025

    August 1, 2025

    BRI investments hit new high

    August 1, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    A Fund That Buys Recent IPO Stocks: Should You Invest?

    August 2, 2025

    Qu’est-ce qu’un green bond ?

    December 7, 2017

    les cat’ bonds deviennent incontournables

    September 5, 2018

    ETF : définition et intérêt des trackers

    May 15, 2019
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    A Fund That Buys Recent IPO Stocks: Should You Invest?

    August 2, 2025

    The primary markets have been buzzing with many companies coming with new issues. Some of…

    Morgan Wallen walks out with Barry Bonds, Steve Young at Santa Clara concert

    August 2, 2025

    Zee Business Mutual Fund Awards 2025: From ICICI to SBI, major AMCs shine as industry celebrates Rs 75 lakh crore milestone

    August 2, 2025

    Back to basics: Multi-factor mutual funds in India

    August 2, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    National Investments Company Kuwait’s Best Investment Bank for ECM for 2025

    May 29, 2025

    Residents discuss bond issue at H-PT meeting | News, Sports, Jobs

    October 24, 2024

    Activity of investment in mutual funds cannot be classified as exempted service hence rule 6 of CCR not applicable

    May 9, 2025
    Our Picks

    A Fund That Buys Recent IPO Stocks: Should You Invest?

    August 2, 2025

    Morgan Wallen walks out with Barry Bonds, Steve Young at Santa Clara concert

    August 2, 2025

    Zee Business Mutual Fund Awards 2025: From ICICI to SBI, major AMCs shine as industry celebrates Rs 75 lakh crore milestone

    August 2, 2025
    Most Popular

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this debt mutual fund has grown to over ₹70 lakh in 23 years

    June 13, 2025

    ₹1 lakh investment in these 2 ELSS mutual funds at launch would have grown to over ₹5 lakh. Check details

    April 25, 2025

    ZIG, BUZZ, NANC, and KRUZ

    October 11, 2024
    © 2025 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.