Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Equity mutual fund AUM touches all-time high in July: NSE
    • Mutual Fund Strategy: What happens when you combine Rs 1 lakh lump sum with Rs 8,333 monthly SIP?
    • How a mutual fund’s AUM impacts returns: Should investors worry when it grows too large?
    • SIP Calculator: I am 30 years old. How much monthly SIP do I need to build a corpus of ₹5 crore by retirement?
    • SEBI considers net settlement for mutual funds to ease cash management pressures
    • Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs Capture $2.6 Billion in Strongest Week Since October
    • SIP Rs 1,000 for 25 Years: How much can 10% annual step-up boost your corpus? See examples
    • Premium bonds: more chance of win as NS&I ups prize fund rate again | Savings
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Property Investments»Property investment scheme shut down by courts
    Property Investments

    Property investment scheme shut down by courts

    November 4, 2018


    A property investment company which operated a “Ponzi scheme” has been shut down by the High Court for misusing close to £20m of investors’ money.

    Essex and London Properties Limited (ELP), which was incorporated in April 2005 with a registered office in Kent, claimed to buy properties to sell them on at a profit or get rental income for investors.

    Investors were enticed to invest by offers of an 8 per cent annual return paid quarterly if the money was held for three years or 12 per cent if the money was held for one year.

    But in reality ELP only bought a single property: a house in Harwich for £147,000, which was less than 1 per cent of the overall amount of money collected from investors.

    Despite only buying one property, the company told investors it had purchased numerous properties which had rapidly increased in value and it falsified Land Registry documents showing the company owned more property than it did.

    As a result of the investigation by the Insolvency Service, the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy issued the petition to wind up the company.

    In September the High Court heard the petition against the company which was unopposed and ordered the company into liquidation.

    David Hill, chief investigator for the Insolvency Service, said: “The company persuaded members of the public to part with substantial sums of money to invest in property. Only one property was purchased and the money raised from the public in reality was used to benefit those running the company.

    “As so often is the case, if an investment scheme appears to be too good to be true, it probably is. There is an ongoing investigation into those individuals controlling Essex and London Properties Limited by Essex Police, who are liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service with a view to prosecuting a number of suspects.”

    The investigation found investors were approached directly or through intermediary platforms, which received 35 per cent of the invested amounts and offered partnerships in a Limited Partnership scheme.

    Over an 18-month period, more than 800 people invested in the company anywhere between £5,000 to more than £100,000 and Essex Police, which has an ongoing investigation, calculated that to date £18.9m was obtained from creditors and investors.

    Investors made payments through a number of escrow agencies. Insolvency Service investigators examined the income and expenditure of statements made by one of these agencies and found that existing investors received their interest payments from payments made by new investors rather than any meaningful return on their investment.

    This led the Insolvency Service to claim the company was operating a Ponzi scheme.

    In January 2018, the company placed itself into voluntary liquidation, claiming to have debts of more than £11m. The creditors, comprised mainly of the investors in the company, initially approved of the liquidation but later supported the Secretary of State’s petition.

    During the investigation, investors were approached by various recovery room businesses offering to recover the amounts, possibly in excess of the initial sums invested, in exchange of an advance fee. One business falsely claimed to be authorised by the chief executive of the Insolvency Service.

    The Insolvency Service warned that any approach in this way to investors should be ignored. Only communications from the official receiver, whose details are listed below, should be responded to and the official receiver has not authorised any third party to act on his behalf, especially in regards to recovering investor’s losses.

    damian.fantato@ft.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Why Busy IT Professionals May Benefit From Using a Buyers Agent for Property Investment

    August 19, 2026

    Commercial property: Stability sells | Law Gazette

    August 5, 2026

    Five Mistakes Investors Make When Buying International Property and How to Avoid Them

    July 31, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    The Evolution of Art and Art Investments: A Historical Perspective on Fruitful Returns and Wealth Management

    August 21, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Equity mutual fund AUM touches all-time high in July: NSE

    August 22, 2026

    NSE report said equity AUM had risen steadily after moderating in March 2026. Equity mutual…

    Mutual Fund Strategy: What happens when you combine Rs 1 lakh lump sum with Rs 8,333 monthly SIP?

    August 22, 2026

    How a mutual fund’s AUM impacts returns: Should investors worry when it grows too large?

    August 22, 2026

    SIP Calculator: I am 30 years old. How much monthly SIP do I need to build a corpus of ₹5 crore by retirement?

    August 22, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Government to allow DB schemes to pay surplus funds directly to members

    November 27, 2025

    Cristiano Ronaldo goes viral after a Red Bull sip reignites memories of his famous Coca-Cola snub

    November 16, 2025

    Foreign investors sell off US $7B in Mexican government bonds

    November 20, 2025
    Our Picks

    Equity mutual fund AUM touches all-time high in July: NSE

    August 22, 2026

    Mutual Fund Strategy: What happens when you combine Rs 1 lakh lump sum with Rs 8,333 monthly SIP?

    August 22, 2026

    How a mutual fund’s AUM impacts returns: Should investors worry when it grows too large?

    August 22, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.