Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Retired Couple Faces a $7,000 IRMAA Surprise From a Mutual Fund They Never Sold
    • Top reasons why exchange-traded fund growth has ballooned
    • Kotak Contra Fund at 21: A look at its returns, portfolio and investor risks
    • Sharp discounts for private credit funds: buy, sell or hold?
    • 4 top-performing thematic PSU funds with the highest returns over 20% in 3 and 5 years; Check performance against the benchmark and category – Mutual Funds News
    • How SIP Investments May Support Long-Term Retirement Planning
    • SBI Funds Management shares fall after steady Q1; AUM growth trails industry average
    • Value funds: Only two schemes have negative alpha; Quant and DSP lead category in benchmark outperformance
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Property Investments»SRA fines London lawyer £17,000 for inadequate advice on property investment deals which fell flat
    Property Investments

    SRA fines London lawyer £17,000 for inadequate advice on property investment deals which fell flat

    September 29, 2025


    A law firm principal who allowed his clients to enter a risky and ultimately fruitless investment scheme has been fined £17,000. Ming Fai Tam, also known as Matthew Tam, charged around £1,300 to clients for every property investment he advised on. In total between 2017 and 2020 his firm Batchford Solicitors worked on behalf of several overseas buyers on their purchase of around 312 properties.

    According to a Solicitors Regulation Authority decision notice, Tam offered no supervision to one of his staff acting on the investments and failed to point out several red flags about the risky nature of the financial commitment.

    The property was being bought from a special purchase vehicle with no trading accounts, with clients paying initial deposits of between 30% and 100% of the purchase price. The company promised to construct or refurbish buildings to turn them into flats, student accommodation or hotel rooms, with the project marketed to buyers mainly in the Far East as buy-to-let investments with guaranteed income. However the developments failed and promised returns were not paid.

    Buy-back provisions included in the investment were of use only  if the selling company had the necessary funds, and rental agreements were potentially unenforceable and ineffective.

    The SRA conducted a forensic investigation of 14 client files in six developments where these failings were identified.

    Tam admitted failing to give adequate advice to clients on the risks inherent in off-plan buyer-led investment schemes and failed to ensure clients understood the risks they were taking on.

    He also admitted failing to train staff to maintain a level of competence or to have a system for supervising clients’ matters. His firm, based in the City of London and latterly known as MFT Solicitors, closed in 2021.

    The SRA said Tam had not heeded warning notices from 2016 and 2017 about the risks of such investment schemes. He had also not fulfilled his duty to provide people in his firm with adequate training and supervision.

    In mitigation, Tam, who now works for Chan Neill Solicitors in the City, said he undertakes training and keeps abreast of legal developments and his files are reviewed by partners in his new firm. He no longer takes on work involving the sale of fractional units such as hotel rooms or office space and takes on work involving new build transactions only where deposits are protected and are no greater than 10%.

    The SRA said a fine was appropriate to uphold public confidence in the solicitors’ profession.

    ‘Clients lost money following their investments in the development schemes which they may have reconsidered had they received proper and adequate advice,’ added the regulator. ‘Issuing a fine to solicitors who give inadequate advice demonstrates to the public that the SRA takes such matters seriously and expects solicitors to maintain appropriate standards.’

    Tam also agree to pay £1,350 costs.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Five Mistakes Investors Make When Buying International Property and How to Avoid Them

    July 31, 2026

    UK property investment firm enters liquidation after complaints upheld | UK | News

    July 20, 2026

    Firm enters liquidation after property investment complaints

    July 20, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    Meet 2 Vanguard ETFs That Just Hit All-Time Highs. Here’s What They Have in Common (Hint: It Has to Do With SpaceX).

    August 4, 2026

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Retired Couple Faces a $7,000 IRMAA Surprise From a Mutual Fund They Never Sold

    August 4, 2026

    © shapecharge / Getty Images A couple in their early 70s opens a December brokerage…

    Top reasons why exchange-traded fund growth has ballooned

    August 4, 2026

    Kotak Contra Fund at 21: A look at its returns, portfolio and investor risks

    August 4, 2026

    Sharp discounts for private credit funds: buy, sell or hold?

    August 4, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Norfolk people win nearly £2m in March’s Premium Bonds draw

    March 2, 2026

    Investors pour billions into ETFs — but their retirement returns are being eroded by these 3 mistakes

    November 16, 2025

    What Makes Planet Fitness (PLNT) a Worthy Investment Option?

    July 28, 2024
    Our Picks

    Retired Couple Faces a $7,000 IRMAA Surprise From a Mutual Fund They Never Sold

    August 4, 2026

    Top reasons why exchange-traded fund growth has ballooned

    August 4, 2026

    Kotak Contra Fund at 21: A look at its returns, portfolio and investor risks

    August 4, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.