Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Evolve Announces February 2026 Distributions for UltraYield ETFs and Certain Evolve Funds
    • Mutual Funds vs PMS: Expert on why PMS isn’t the superior product many assume; what investors should know
    • Leveraged ETFs Are Not Long-Term Holdings. Here’s Why.
    • Why wealth managers are swapping money market funds for buffer ETFs
    • New ETFs Will Now Let You Bet on Who Wins the White House in 2028
    • Largest mutual fund managers by total NAV in 2025 
    • Bitwise Seeks SEC Approval for ETFs Based on 2028 Election Predictions
    • Why mutual funds are emerging as the default investment choice
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»ETFs»Why Grayscale’s fees for its $10bn Ethereum ETF are a ‘nonstarter’ for investors – DL News
    ETFs

    Why Grayscale’s fees for its $10bn Ethereum ETF are a ‘nonstarter’ for investors – DL News

    July 18, 2024


    • Grayscale Investments is keeping its spot Ethereum ETF fees at 2.5%.
    • That’s 10 times more expensive than its competitors’ fees.
    • The ETF will likely suffer high outflows at launch.

    The results are in: Grayscale Investments will keep charging a 2.5% fee to holders of its Ethereum trust when it converts into an exchange-traded fund.

    That’s a massive fee compared with other potential Ethereum ETFs — which are all set to launch on July 23.

    “Grayscale isn’t lowering its fees at all,” Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst Eric Balchunas wrote on X, pointing out that the firm’s ETF will be roughly 10 times more expensive than its competition.

    “Probably will cause some outrage flows,” Balchunas added.

    By comparison, the Ethereum ETFs issued by BlackRock and Fidelity Investments will each have a 0.25% fee, VanEck and Bitwise will each charge 0.20%, and Franklin Templeton 0.19%.

    Inflows and outflows

    Grayscale’s case is unique in that it isn’t spinning up a new fund from scratch, but converting its existing Ethereum Trust — ticker ETHE, which holds almost $10 billion in assets — into an ETF.

    The trust was designed in such a way that investors could create new shares, but not redeem them. Even so, the trust was popular for a long time because it was one of the only ways for Wall Street investors to get exposure to Ethereum.

    And because it was the only game in town, Grayscale could get away with its 2.5% fees.

    Join the community to get our latest stories and updates

    But once the trust converts into a fund — at the same time all other Ethereum ETFs launch — investors will be able to finally redeem their shares.

    And because other Ethereum ETFs will launch imminently, Grayscale risks seeing outflows from its fund to cheaper alternatives.

    The same thing happened with spot Bitcoin ETFs: Grayscale has seen more than $18 billion in outflows since it converted its Bitcoin trust into an ETF in January.

    BlackRock and Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETFs, meanwhile, have amassed over $30 billion in assets between the two of them.

    Grayscale didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    High fees and no yield

    Alongside ETHE’s conversion, Grayscale is launching a separate spot Ethereum ETF, called the mini Ethereum ETF. The mini fund will process smaller fees — 0.25% — and will be seeded with 10% of ETHE’s assets upon launch.

    The move “should help alleviate some of the likely Grayscale outflows,” Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seyffart posted on X.

    But not everyone is convinced.

    “There’s one massive idiosyncratic factor with Ethereum that will affect demand and that’s staking,” Adam Morgan McCarthy, an analyst at crypto data firm Kaiko Research, told DL News.

    When using crypto infrastructure, Ethereum holders can lock their Ether in the network — a process called staking — to receive a 3% yield. But the Ethereum ETFs won’t give holders that opportunity.

    “The value proposition for a crypto-native fund holding ETHE is hard to see when these funds can redeem shares and buy Ether to stake in return for yields — as opposed to paying high fees to stick around in Grayscale’s fund,” McCarthy said.

    “Even paying 0.2% without the staking element seems like a nonstarter to me,” he added.

    McCarthy pointed out that, because Ethereum enabled staking relatively recently, in 2022, some ETHE investors are likely still waiting to exit the fund and lock their Ether in staking protocols.

    “Expect outflows from ETHE and some reallocation into new funds which are launching with waivers and low fees,” McCarthy said.

    “But a decent chunk of outflows will exit the market altogether,” he added.

    Tom Carreras is a markets correspondent at DL News. Got a tip about Grayscale and Ethereum ETFs? Reach out at tcarreras@dlnews.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Leveraged ETFs Are Not Long-Term Holdings. Here’s Why.

    February 18, 2026

    Why wealth managers are swapping money market funds for buffer ETFs

    February 18, 2026

    New ETFs Will Now Let You Bet on Who Wins the White House in 2028

    February 18, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    Leveraged ETFs Are Not Long-Term Holdings. Here’s Why.

    February 18, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Evolve Announces February 2026 Distributions for UltraYield ETFs and Certain Evolve Funds

    February 18, 2026

    Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – February 18, 2026) – Evolve Funds Group Inc. (“Evolve”) is pleased…

    Mutual Funds vs PMS: Expert on why PMS isn’t the superior product many assume; what investors should know

    February 18, 2026

    Leveraged ETFs Are Not Long-Term Holdings. Here’s Why.

    February 18, 2026

    Why wealth managers are swapping money market funds for buffer ETFs

    February 18, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    3 Guggenheim Mutual Funds for Optimal Returns – August 16, 2024

    August 16, 2024

    Vanguard effect loses potency as new ETFs post record high in fees

    May 27, 2025

    The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy

    August 8, 2025
    Our Picks

    Evolve Announces February 2026 Distributions for UltraYield ETFs and Certain Evolve Funds

    February 18, 2026

    Mutual Funds vs PMS: Expert on why PMS isn’t the superior product many assume; what investors should know

    February 18, 2026

    Leveraged ETFs Are Not Long-Term Holdings. Here’s Why.

    February 18, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.