Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Taking Mutual funds 11,500 ft above sea level, Nippon India MF takes the first baby step
    • Former Axis fund manager held for cheating investors
    • The 10 best-performing ETFs in July 2025 and the best projection for August 2025
    • ED arrests ex-Axis MF fund manager in ‘front-running’ case
    • How Standard Chartered’s Saurabh Jain has built wealth with mutual funds, EPF
    • Need to increase R&D investments to strengthen agri: ICAR DG
    • Grilling Season and ETFs: More Than One Way to Cook Up a Portfolio
    • Microsoft and Meta fuel $648 billion rally in AI stocks as investments pay off
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Investments»SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors
    Investments

    SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors

    October 31, 2024


    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors LLC.

    The SEC complaint, seen by FX News Group, was submitted at the Florida Southern District Court on October 30, 2024.

    From May 2020 to at least January 2024, Dusan Varga and his company Pannon Investment Advisors LLC, raised approximately $1.6 million from at least 20 investors, through a series of unregistered and fraudulent offerings.

    The defendants solicited investments in securities through investment agreements to invest in the Pannon Risk-Managed Income Fund, a purported investment fund managed by the defendants. Defendants misrepresented that the Pannon Fund traded covered stock options to generate high income while managing downside risk, while promising investors fixed returns in the form of dividends of 3% or 4% a month.

    The defendants used a combination of phone calls, text messages, WhatsApp messages, emails, in-person meetings, Zoom meetings, and written documents to solicit investors.

    Defendants also solicited investors via a referral program under which they paid referral fees to existing investors for referring new investors to invest in the Pannon Fund, Defendants’ client.

    Further, the defendants made numerous material misrepresentations about the use of investor and client funds, the profitability of Pannon’s trading, Varga’s purported background as a registered representative of a broker-dealer, and the safety of investing with the Pannon Fund. For example, Defendants falsely represented to investors that, upon their demand, investors could receive a full return of their principal funds within a few business days and that investors’ principal funds were matched in an escrow account to ensure the liquidity of their investments.

    In reality, there was no escrow account, the defendants made Ponzi-like payments to investors, and Varga misappropriated and commingled investor and client funds in his own personal bank and brokerage accounts.

    Rather than using investor and client funds to consistently trade covered stock options as promised to investors, Defendants often engaged in riskier, uncovered options trading that ultimately resulted in aggregate trading losses of over $200,000.

    The scheme unraveled during the last quarter of 2023, when Varga and Pannon stopped making dividend payments to investors, initially blaming the delay in payment on processing issues with online bill pay services and banks. Despite numerous redemption requests by investors, Varga and Pannon have failed to return investors’ principal funds.

    The SEC accuses the defendants of violation of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c) and 77q(a)], and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]. Varga and Pannon also violated Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1), (2), and (4) and 17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8)] and breach of the fiduciary duties they owed to their advisory client, the Pannon Fund.

    The Commission seeks injunctive relief, as well as disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against the defendants. The Commission also seeks an order imposing an officer and director bar against Varga.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Need to increase R&D investments to strengthen agri: ICAR DG

    August 3, 2025

    Microsoft and Meta fuel $648 billion rally in AI stocks as investments pay off

    August 3, 2025

    Hochul blames ‘lack of investments’ for MTA’s hellish service meltdowns, even as bloated transit agency eyes fare hike to $3

    August 1, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Taking Mutual funds 11,500 ft above sea level, Nippon India MF takes the first baby step

    August 3, 2025

    Qu’est-ce qu’un green bond ?

    December 7, 2017

    les cat’ bonds deviennent incontournables

    September 5, 2018

    ETF : définition et intérêt des trackers

    May 15, 2019
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Taking Mutual funds 11,500 ft above sea level, Nippon India MF takes the first baby step

    August 3, 2025

    Nippon India MF reaches Leh Tsewang Namgyal, a car driver in Leh, plans to put…

    Former Axis fund manager held for cheating investors

    August 3, 2025

    The 10 best-performing ETFs in July 2025 and the best projection for August 2025

    August 3, 2025

    ED arrests ex-Axis MF fund manager in ‘front-running’ case

    August 3, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Can BlackRock bring indexing and ETFs to private markets?

    August 19, 2024

    Reader supports Shepherd School District bond extension – The Morning Sun

    July 20, 2024

    Officials with some of Colorado Springs’ largest events react to funding changes for 2025

    October 13, 2024
    Our Picks

    Taking Mutual funds 11,500 ft above sea level, Nippon India MF takes the first baby step

    August 3, 2025

    Former Axis fund manager held for cheating investors

    August 3, 2025

    The 10 best-performing ETFs in July 2025 and the best projection for August 2025

    August 3, 2025
    Most Popular

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this debt mutual fund has grown to over ₹70 lakh in 23 years

    June 13, 2025

    ₹1 lakh investment in these 2 ELSS mutual funds at launch would have grown to over ₹5 lakh. Check details

    April 25, 2025

    ZIG, BUZZ, NANC, and KRUZ

    October 11, 2024
    © 2025 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.