Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • REIT mutual funds vs REITs: Why the fund route may be the smarter bet
    • Looking for top SIP performers? These 7 equity mutual funds delivered over 20% returns in 10 years
    • Small-cap funds lead FY27 so far, beating mid, flexi and large-cap funds; JM Small Cap tops chart with over 32% return
    • No international funds open? These 15 domestic funds still hold foreign equities — two schemes have over 26% allocation
    • Apple Soared 15% in July, but GPIQ Holders Lost 6%: The Hidden Options Tax on Covered-Call ETFs
    • Distributor commissions reduce as fund houses pass on impact of new expense ratio regime – Mutual Funds News
    • Investing in mutual funds? Experts explain the behavioural biases that can quietly reduce your long-term returns
    • Your Money: Laddering strategy in bonds can optimise yield capture – Money News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Investments»SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors
    Investments

    SEC files lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors

    October 31, 2024


    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Dusan Varga and Pannon Investment Advisors LLC.

    The SEC complaint, seen by FX News Group, was submitted at the Florida Southern District Court on October 30, 2024.

    From May 2020 to at least January 2024, Dusan Varga and his company Pannon Investment Advisors LLC, raised approximately $1.6 million from at least 20 investors, through a series of unregistered and fraudulent offerings.

    The defendants solicited investments in securities through investment agreements to invest in the Pannon Risk-Managed Income Fund, a purported investment fund managed by the defendants. Defendants misrepresented that the Pannon Fund traded covered stock options to generate high income while managing downside risk, while promising investors fixed returns in the form of dividends of 3% or 4% a month.

    The defendants used a combination of phone calls, text messages, WhatsApp messages, emails, in-person meetings, Zoom meetings, and written documents to solicit investors.

    Defendants also solicited investors via a referral program under which they paid referral fees to existing investors for referring new investors to invest in the Pannon Fund, Defendants’ client.

    Further, the defendants made numerous material misrepresentations about the use of investor and client funds, the profitability of Pannon’s trading, Varga’s purported background as a registered representative of a broker-dealer, and the safety of investing with the Pannon Fund. For example, Defendants falsely represented to investors that, upon their demand, investors could receive a full return of their principal funds within a few business days and that investors’ principal funds were matched in an escrow account to ensure the liquidity of their investments.

    In reality, there was no escrow account, the defendants made Ponzi-like payments to investors, and Varga misappropriated and commingled investor and client funds in his own personal bank and brokerage accounts.

    Rather than using investor and client funds to consistently trade covered stock options as promised to investors, Defendants often engaged in riskier, uncovered options trading that ultimately resulted in aggregate trading losses of over $200,000.

    The scheme unraveled during the last quarter of 2023, when Varga and Pannon stopped making dividend payments to investors, initially blaming the delay in payment on processing issues with online bill pay services and banks. Despite numerous redemption requests by investors, Varga and Pannon have failed to return investors’ principal funds.

    The SEC accuses the defendants of violation of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c) and 77q(a)], and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]. Varga and Pannon also violated Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1), (2), and (4) and 17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8)] and breach of the fiduciary duties they owed to their advisory client, the Pannon Fund.

    The Commission seeks injunctive relief, as well as disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against the defendants. The Commission also seeks an order imposing an officer and director bar against Varga.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    PE/VC investments drop 36% in H12026: EY-IVCA – Business News

    July 31, 2026

    IRDAI clears investments in private companies, eases infrastructure funding norms

    July 30, 2026

    A Fisher Investments Yield Curve Primer

    July 30, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Three Best Closed-End Funds To Buy For 2024: December Edition

    January 26, 2024

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    REIT mutual funds vs REITs: Why the fund route may be the smarter bet

    August 3, 2026

    For many Indians, real estate has always been a favoured asset class. But large capital…

    Looking for top SIP performers? These 7 equity mutual funds delivered over 20% returns in 10 years

    August 2, 2026

    Small-cap funds lead FY27 so far, beating mid, flexi and large-cap funds; JM Small Cap tops chart with over 32% return

    August 2, 2026

    No international funds open? These 15 domestic funds still hold foreign equities — two schemes have over 26% allocation

    August 2, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Why debt mutual funds are meant to stabilise portfolios, not create wealth

    January 6, 2026

    Anil Singhvi shares his ‘Navratna’ SIP pick; target implies 2x growth

    September 21, 2025

    Gold pushes towards record as ETFs expand in run-up to the Fed

    September 11, 2025
    Our Picks

    REIT mutual funds vs REITs: Why the fund route may be the smarter bet

    August 3, 2026

    Looking for top SIP performers? These 7 equity mutual funds delivered over 20% returns in 10 years

    August 2, 2026

    Small-cap funds lead FY27 so far, beating mid, flexi and large-cap funds; JM Small Cap tops chart with over 32% return

    August 2, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.