Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Top 10 small-cap mutual funds: Which schemes delivered high returns with relatively lower risk?
    • Why Mutual Funds Fail Against ULIPs
    • How much tax should an investor pay on ₹3 lakh profit from shares or mutual funds? Check calculations
    • As rate hike looms, short duration, alternative and bond ETFs in the spotlight at Future Proof
    • Rs 25,000 Monthly SIP For 5 Years: How much could your investment have grown in top-performing midcap mutual funds?
    • Focused funds stay on fringes despite MF boom – Market News
    • Specialised investment funds vs mutual funds
    • Missed the 7th Annual ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit Asia Pacific? You can still register to access the recordings from both days
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Piedmont voters to decide on $16.7 bond impacting infrastructure, taxes
    Bonds

    Piedmont voters to decide on $16.7 bond impacting infrastructure, taxes

    August 27, 2024


    PIEDMONT, Okla. (KOKH) — Tomorrow, Piedmont voters will decide the fate of a bond package worth $16.7 million. City leaders say if it passes, the program will fund street and building improvements, and even bring a sports complex to town.

    Fox 25 is seeing mixed reactions around town ahead of Election Day. This is mostly because of how these bonds would impact property taxes.

    “I am 100% against all of it,” Resident Ali Taylor said.

    Taylor shares her concerns before Piedmont voters decide on three bond propositions Tuesday.

    “The biggest thing is they want the taxpayers to pay for all of that.”

    If everything passes, residents would see a monthly property tax increase ranging from $50 to $100, depending on their home value, for the next 20 years.

    “I’m a single mom. My daughter has high medical bills for other things, and so that’s a huge increase for me. We can’t afford it. Some people might be able to, and that’s awesome. But, I can’t.”

    City Manager Josh Williams says voters should evaluate their finances.

    But, he also speaks highly of Proposition 1, where $10 million would be used for improving roads, which have been a concern for years.

    “Create a more safe transportation network for our residents is one of our key focuses,” Williams said. “We have a high school that sits on a two-lane road. In the busy traffic times, which are typically during the school year, it makes it difficult for residents to get around. For first responders when there’s a call, they generally end up in oncoming traffic or pushing cars off to the side of the road. It’s just creating a safety concern.”

    Williams says most of the $4 million from Proposition 2 would go towards building a sports complex.

    “We have a lot of our community members that leave our community for sports, so we’re losing a lot of that retail leakage to surrounding communities. We really want to keep that here in Piedmont.”

    $1.9 million in the final proposition would fund upgrades to public safety buildings.

    “We also have a sally port, and a jail cell that needs to be secure, especially being so close to the baseball fields here for little league.”

    Williams has a request, no matter how residents feel about what’s being proposed.

    “Get out and vote. We have had historically low voter turnout. We have a little over 5,900 registered voters. We would like to make history here in Piedmont, and see us have the highest voter turnout for these general bonds. Their vote is their voice.”

    Amid all of this, there’s some controversy.

    Piedmont Public Schools (PPS) sent district families a flyer last Thursday, August 22, that says “vote yes” on these bonds. Superintendent Dr. Drew Eichelberger says sent families a follow-up letter acknowledging what happened.

    He says his district shared a flyer from its email database that was sent to them, and they originally didn’t see the words “vote yes” in the graphic.

    Eichelberger says he takes full responsibility for this mistake, and adds that he understands this is a clear violation of Oklahoma law.

    He told families the district will do better.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Tatjana Greil-Castro on Bonds : «I Almost Find Kevin Warsh Likeable»

    September 13, 2026

    Stocks and bonds are moving together. Here’s why you shouldn’t worry

    September 11, 2026

    Martin Lewis gives Premium Bonds £5,000 alert adding ‘little or nothing’

    September 11, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Top 10 small-cap mutual funds: Which schemes delivered high returns with relatively lower risk?

    September 15, 2026

    Focused funds stay on fringes despite MF boom – Market News

    September 14, 2026

    As rate hike looms, short duration, alternative and bond ETFs in the spotlight at Future Proof

    September 14, 2026

    Private equity funds to buy as the sector bounces back

    September 11, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Top 10 small-cap mutual funds: Which schemes delivered high returns with relatively lower risk?

    September 15, 2026

    Small-cap mutual funds have continued to attract investor money, with the category recording a record…

    Why Mutual Funds Fail Against ULIPs

    September 14, 2026

    How much tax should an investor pay on ₹3 lakh profit from shares or mutual funds? Check calculations

    September 14, 2026

    As rate hike looms, short duration, alternative and bond ETFs in the spotlight at Future Proof

    September 14, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    BOP Realty’s Gaurav Mavi Commends New LTCG Tax Amendment for Boosting Real Estate Investments

    August 24, 2024

    UK funds industry calls on Chancellor to rebuild public trust in markets

    October 31, 2025

    Key mutual fund trends observed in April 2025

    May 20, 2025
    Our Picks

    Top 10 small-cap mutual funds: Which schemes delivered high returns with relatively lower risk?

    September 15, 2026

    Why Mutual Funds Fail Against ULIPs

    September 14, 2026

    How much tax should an investor pay on ₹3 lakh profit from shares or mutual funds? Check calculations

    September 14, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    🇮🇸 CPP Investments and Equinix complete atNorth acquisition to support growth of leading Nordic data center platform

    September 1, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.