Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Focused Fund Explained: Definition, Functionality, and Examples
    • 7 Dividend ETFs I’d Buy Today and Hold for the Next 20 Years
    • Diversifying Your Portfolio with Index Funds
    • Japanese bonds decline as Takaichi gears up for political gamble
    • Sub-Advised Funds Explained: Management, Strategies, and Costs
    • A Guide to Investor Security
    • Top ELSS Mutual Funds in 2026
    • Planning your child’s future? Here’s how to invest via direct mutual funds
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»STATE BOND MEASURE MAY MEAN $68M PLUS FOR MUSD
    Bonds

    STATE BOND MEASURE MAY MEAN $68M PLUS FOR MUSD

    August 7, 2024


    Approval of Proposition 2 — the $10 billion bond measure for modernizing public school facilities on the Nov. 5 ballot — would likely mean at least $68 million to further improve Manteca Unified campuses.

    That’s because Manteca Unified has a number of approved projects on a waiting list eligible for “reimbursement” from the $4 billion portion of the bond set aside for modernization.

    The $68 million actually represents the state’s share of completed projects — and endeavors underway to modernize facilities funded with two local bond measures.

    They are the $159 million Measure G bonds voters approved in 2014 and the $260 million Measure A bonds voters approved in 2020.

    Local bond receipts were used to cover the state’s share of eligible construction projects while waiting on the promise of being reimbursed.

    As of June 20, the school district has received $22.7 million from the state toward Measure G work such as what was done at Golden West, Lincoln, Sequoia, and Lathrop elementary schools to name a few.

    The “reimbursement” is essential in order for the district to have funds to tackle the third and fourth phases of the modernization endeavors at the 104 year-old Manteca High campus and the 58 year-old East Union High campus as well as work at the 16 year-old L:athrp High campus.

    Manteca Unified has been methodical in first advancing bond projects that qualified for state matching fund to take advantage of the dwindling pool of available funds in Sacramento.

    At the same time, doing so has put them in the queue for state funds when there is money available to cover additional projects such as most of the $68 million tied to projects that Sacramento has already approved for reimbursement.

    Further reimbursement than what the district has already received is contingent on the state having the money to do so. Proposition 2 will help cover the tab.

    Manteca Unified has other Measure A projects that may qualify for state funding yet to be approved by Sacramento.

    The approach the district took means the combined $419 million between the two local bonds could in reality cover the cost of at least $509 million in facility upgrades when state funding is provided.

    A districtwide assessment five years ago identified just over $550 million of modernization need in constant 2019 dollars.

    As schools continue to age and construction inflation eats into funding, there will be a shortfall of tackling all the needs identified in the facility master plan.

    That said, the district — when all is said and done — will have been able to tackle a vast majority of the facility modernization and upgrades they set out to tackle with the two bond measures.

    They have stretched local bond dollars further by taking advantage of restricted funds to address some projects listed in the facilities master plan.

    The biggest item is the replacement of aging HVAC systems that the state made a priority  and provided funds for — during the pandemic.

    That money freed up bond money that would have gone toward HVAC replacement.

    Given there are more than 1,600 classrooms in addition to support facilities districtwide, the HVAC work represents a substantial cost savings in bond expenditures.

    It should be noted state school bonds are secured by the state’s general fund and not property tax as in the case of local school bonds.

    Proposition 2 also includes $3.3 billion for new construction.

    The bulk of that is likely to go to build new facilities for state mandate transitional kindergarten classes.

    Manteca Unified is pursuing an early education campus on Tinnin Road for kindergarten and transitional kindergarten that would be eligible for funding from that portion of Proposition 2.

    Proposition 2 also includes $115 million for lead in water testing and remediation, $600 million for career technical education, and $600 million for charter schools.

    The district, which received state funding for the CTE complex recently built at East Union, is also seeking funding for a new CTE faciality at Manteca a High.

    As such, that part of the bond could relieve local property taxpayers of costs connected with building a CTE complex at Manteca High.

    California’s public schools serve more than 6 million students at 10,000-plus schools in more than 300,000 classrooms —  70% of which are more than 25 years old.

    Schools statewide are projected to need about $117 billion for facilities. About 69% of that amount is needed for school maintenance and modernization— updating science labs and adding computers, for example — while only 10% is needed to keep pace with enrollment or address overcrowding.

     

    To contact Dennis Wyatt, email dwyatt@mantecabulletin.com

     

     



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Japanese bonds decline as Takaichi gears up for political gamble

    January 12, 2026

    A Guide to Investor Security

    January 12, 2026

    What’s driving bonds today: RBI boost, lighter supply, and a big PFC issue

    January 12, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    7 Dividend ETFs I’d Buy Today and Hold for the Next 20 Years

    January 12, 2026

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Focused Fund Explained: Definition, Functionality, and Examples

    January 13, 2026

    Key Takeaways A focused fund is a mutual fund that invests in a limited number…

    7 Dividend ETFs I’d Buy Today and Hold for the Next 20 Years

    January 12, 2026

    Diversifying Your Portfolio with Index Funds

    January 12, 2026

    Japanese bonds decline as Takaichi gears up for political gamble

    January 12, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Tokenized Money Market Funds Surpass $9B, BIS Warns of New Risks

    November 26, 2025

    Ineos: Jim Ratcliffe’s Chemicals Bonds Cause a Painful Market Reaction

    November 24, 2025

    Conserving the craft of investing

    July 15, 2024
    Our Picks

    Focused Fund Explained: Definition, Functionality, and Examples

    January 13, 2026

    7 Dividend ETFs I’d Buy Today and Hold for the Next 20 Years

    January 12, 2026

    Diversifying Your Portfolio with Index Funds

    January 12, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.