Best target-date funds for retirement income and longevity risk

The best target-date funds dominate US retirement plans because they simplify portfolio management at scale. These strategies package asset allocation and rebalancing into a single fund tied to a retirement year.

Comparing the best target-date funds requires looking past labels and performance snapshots. Structure drives outcomes. Glide path design, changing equity exposure, active versus index implementation, vehicle choice and fee layering all help explain why similar target‑date funds can behave very differently.

The best target-date funds are typically offered as series built around a shared glide path and investment philosophy. This section outlines some major target-date strategy groups, each representing a distinct approach to asset allocation, risk management, and implementation across multiple retirement years.

BlackRock LifePath Index

BlackRock LifePath Index strategies are built around an index-based glide path design. Across mutual fund, collective investment trust, and ETF formats, these strategies rely on low-cost index funds as their core building blocks. The glide paths are research-driven and consistently applied with asset allocation decisions embedded in the design rather than adjusted opportunistically.

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic strategies use the same underlying glide path framework as the LifePath Index series but apply a more active implementation. These strategies incorporate tactical asset allocation and actively managed underlying investments. While the approach allows for more flexibility, it also introduces higher costs.

Capital Group/American Funds Target-Date

Capital Group/American Funds target-date strategies are built from actively managed funds. Investment oversight follows an objectives-based framework that allocates assets across broad categories. As the glide path progresses, portfolios gradually shift from growth-oriented holdings toward strategies focused on income and capital preservation.

Capital Group Target-Date Retirement Blend

Capital Group’s Target-Date Retirement Blend strategies combine active and index-based investments within the same glide path. This approach introduces index exposure alongside Capital Group’s active strategies to manage costs while retaining active oversight. Index allocations increase over time particularly for investors closer to retirement.

Fidelity Freedom Index

Fidelity Freedom Index strategies follow an index-only allocation discipline. Asset allocation decisions are driven by Fidelity’s centralized research team, and the strategies do not incorporate opportunistic or tactical allocation shifts. The focus remains on maintaining consistent exposure across the glide path while keeping costs low and implementation straightforward.

T. Rowe Price Retirement

T. Rowe Price Retirement strategies are defined by a high-equity glide path. Equity exposure starts well above industry averages for younger investors and remains elevated throughout the lifecycle. This design reflects the view that higher growth potential is necessary to address longevity risk and relatively low savings rates.

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend

The T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend strategies offer a lower-cost alternative to the firm’s flagship Retirement series. These portfolios use the same glide path but combine active and passive underlying funds.

Vanguard Target Retirement CITs

Vanguard Target Retirement collective investment trusts are built on a simple four-fund index structure that provides broad exposure to stocks and bonds. The glide path begins with high equity exposure and gradually declines to a more balanced allocation well into retirement.

Visit our Retirement Plannning News section for more information on the best target-date funds.

Target-date funds are organized by retirement year to align portfolio risk with an investor’s time horizon. Each vintage reflects a different point along the glide path with asset allocation shifting as the target date approaches. Here’s a look at the different target-date funds:

2030 Target-Date Funds

2030 target-date funds prioritize income stability and portfolio resilience. Equity exposure is materially lower than in earlier vintages, and allocations are designed to limit drawdowns around the retirement date. These funds support near-term spending needs while managing risks associated with market volatility.

2035 Target-Date Funds

2035 target-date funds are closer to retirement and reflect a stronger focus on capital preservation. Asset allocation becomes more defensive, with a larger share of the portfolio allocated to fixed income. Growth remains part of the strategy, but risk management takes priority as retirement approaches.

2040 Target-Date Funds

2040 target-date funds place greater emphasis on volatility reduction. Equity allocations continue to decline in favor of bonds and other lower-risk assets. The objective is to preserve accumulated capital while still maintaining enough growth potential to support long-term retirement needs.

2045 Target-Date Funds

2045 target-date funds typically sit at a transition point. Equity exposure remains significant, but the glide path has started to shift more meaningfully toward fixed income. These strategies balance continued growth with the early stages of risk moderation as retirement moves into a clearer view.

2050 Target-Date Funds

2050 target-date funds remain firmly in the accumulation phase. While still equity-heavy, these portfolios begin to reflect a slightly more balanced posture than later-dated funds. The focus remains on growth but with early signs of diversification that prepare for gradual risk reduction in future years.

2055 Target-Date Funds

2055 target-date funds are positioned at the earliest stage of the lifecycle. These strategies carry the highest equity exposure and emphasize long-term growth. The extended time horizon allows portfolios to remain heavily invested in stocks, accepting short-term volatility in exchange for higher return potential over multiple decades.

Although target-date funds share a common structure, outcomes vary based on glide path design, equity exposure, and cost discipline. These differences become more visible as funds move closer to retirement.

Learn how industry leaders use target-date funds to support clients in this special report on the top RIA firms in the US.

Cost is one of the few variables in target-date fund design that investors can assess with certainty. Differences in underlying fund construction can compound over time, making cost discipline a key consideration when evaluating the best target-date funds.

Expense ratios

Expense ratios are a central cost consideration in target-date funds. Fees typically range from well under 0.10 percent for index-based strategies to more than 0.60 percent for actively managed series. Since target-date funds are for long holding periods, even small differences in expense ratios can significantly impact outcomes.

Active vs. passive pricing

Index-based target-date funds generally offer clear pricing advantages. Strategies built primarily from passive funds tend to have lower and more predictable costs. By contrast, actively managed target-date funds carry higher expense ratios in exchange for discretionary security selection and allocation decisions.

Layered fund costs

Target-date funds use a fund-of-funds structure, which means total costs reflect more than a single headline fee. In addition to the stated expense ratio, investors indirectly bear the costs of the underlying funds held within the portfolio.

There is no single average return as returns vary widely based on retirement year, equity exposure, and glide path design. Longer-dated funds generally post higher returns because they hold more stocks for longer periods. Shorter-dated funds show lower returns as they shift toward bonds and other lower-risk assets.

• long-dated target-date funds (such as 2050 or 2055 vintages) have historically delivered higher returns because they remain equity-heavy
• mid-dated funds reflect a mix of growth and risk reduction, with returns moderating over time
• near-retirement funds (such as 2030 or 2035 vintages) tend to show lower returns as capital preservation becomes the priority

Because of this structure, average returns are not comparable across vintages. Higher returns usually reflect higher risk, not superior fund design. That’s why return figures alone are a weak metric for evaluating target-date funds without considering glide path, volatility, and time horizon.

So, with no guarantee, why get target-date funds? Here are some of the pros and cons of this strategy:

Many of the world’s wealthiest companies by market capitalization are held indirectly through diversified portfolios. They include the best target-date funds, which gain exposure to large-cap equities in broad market allocations.

You can find the best target-date funds through several channels. Where and how an investor accesses a target-date fund can affect cost, vehicle type, and available share classes.

Employer-sponsored plans

Employer-sponsored retirement plans are the primary access point for target-date funds. Most 401(k) plans use target-date strategies as default investments, making them the first and often only exposure many workers have to these funds. Within these plans, target-date offerings are commonly structured as mutual funds or collective investment trusts.

Brokerage accounts

Target-date funds are also available through brokerage accounts. In this setting, investors typically access mutual fund versions of target-date strategies with limited availability of ETF-based options. While most workplace plans cannot use ETF target-date funds, these vehicles can be used in IRAs or taxable accounts. Availability and share class selection depend on the brokerage platform and the fund provider.

Direct provider purchases

Investors can purchase target-date funds directly from fund providers such as Vanguard, Fidelity, or T. Rowe Price. These purchases often come with minimum investment requirements, which can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars depending on the fund and share class. Some providers reduce or waive minimums when investors commit to automatic contributions.

Target-date strategies are delivered through different investment vehicles. The choice of vehicle affects pricing, availability, and how target-date funds are implemented across retirement and non-retirement accounts.

Mutual funds

Mutual funds remain the most widely used vehicle for target-date strategies. They are broadly available across employer-sponsored plans and brokerage platforms and typically offer multiple share classes with varying expense ratios. This allows plan sponsors to select versions that fit their investment requirements. Many of the best target-date funds are offered in mutual fund form alongside other vehicles.

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs)

Target-date ETFs have limited availability compared with mutual funds and CITs. In practice, they are primarily used in IRAs or taxable accounts rather than workplace retirement plans. While the ETF format offers transparency and intraday liquidity, it represents a small portion of the overall target-date market.

Collective Investment Trusts (CITs)

Collective investment trusts are available only through qualified retirement plans, such as 401(k) plans. Despite this limitation, CITs have grown rapidly and now account for more than half of all target-date assets. The appeal lies in lower fees, simplified administration, and flexibility at the plan level.

The best target-date funds translate long-term portfolio decisions into a standardized framework. Their usefulness depends less on labels and more on structure. For financial professionals and RIAs, these strategies function as tools for scale and consistency that still require informed evaluation.

Advisors and plan sponsors can also use the Department of Labor’s target-date retirement funds tips as a reference when comparing series for retirement plans.”

Subscribe to InvestmentNews today to access premium guidance and in-depth analysis.