Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • EPF Vs NPS Vs Mutual Funds: Which Builds A Stronger Retirement Corpus | Savings and Investments News
    • SECP Launches New Funds That Let Investors Earn Profits By Saving the Planet
    • International ETFs Are Crushing VOO in 2026. Here Are 3 Worth Buying Now
    • Can Mutual Funds Pay Your Home Loan? This Viral Strategy Shows How | Savings and Investments News
    • Why Investing In Bonds Is Not Your Only Choice If You’re Over 50
    • Global equity funds draw second weekly inflow amid war de-escalation hopes
    • Volatile stock market, falling gold prices: Are long-term government bonds the smart bet now?
    • High-Potential Mutual Fund SIP Portfolios in 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Property Investments»Property investment scheme shut down by courts
    Property Investments

    Property investment scheme shut down by courts

    November 4, 2018


    A property investment company which operated a “Ponzi scheme” has been shut down by the High Court for misusing close to £20m of investors’ money.

    Essex and London Properties Limited (ELP), which was incorporated in April 2005 with a registered office in Kent, claimed to buy properties to sell them on at a profit or get rental income for investors.

    Investors were enticed to invest by offers of an 8 per cent annual return paid quarterly if the money was held for three years or 12 per cent if the money was held for one year.

    But in reality ELP only bought a single property: a house in Harwich for £147,000, which was less than 1 per cent of the overall amount of money collected from investors.

    Despite only buying one property, the company told investors it had purchased numerous properties which had rapidly increased in value and it falsified Land Registry documents showing the company owned more property than it did.

    As a result of the investigation by the Insolvency Service, the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy issued the petition to wind up the company.

    In September the High Court heard the petition against the company which was unopposed and ordered the company into liquidation.

    David Hill, chief investigator for the Insolvency Service, said: “The company persuaded members of the public to part with substantial sums of money to invest in property. Only one property was purchased and the money raised from the public in reality was used to benefit those running the company.

    “As so often is the case, if an investment scheme appears to be too good to be true, it probably is. There is an ongoing investigation into those individuals controlling Essex and London Properties Limited by Essex Police, who are liaising with the Crown Prosecution Service with a view to prosecuting a number of suspects.”

    The investigation found investors were approached directly or through intermediary platforms, which received 35 per cent of the invested amounts and offered partnerships in a Limited Partnership scheme.

    Over an 18-month period, more than 800 people invested in the company anywhere between £5,000 to more than £100,000 and Essex Police, which has an ongoing investigation, calculated that to date £18.9m was obtained from creditors and investors.

    Investors made payments through a number of escrow agencies. Insolvency Service investigators examined the income and expenditure of statements made by one of these agencies and found that existing investors received their interest payments from payments made by new investors rather than any meaningful return on their investment.

    This led the Insolvency Service to claim the company was operating a Ponzi scheme.

    In January 2018, the company placed itself into voluntary liquidation, claiming to have debts of more than £11m. The creditors, comprised mainly of the investors in the company, initially approved of the liquidation but later supported the Secretary of State’s petition.

    During the investigation, investors were approached by various recovery room businesses offering to recover the amounts, possibly in excess of the initial sums invested, in exchange of an advance fee. One business falsely claimed to be authorised by the chief executive of the Insolvency Service.

    The Insolvency Service warned that any approach in this way to investors should be ignored. Only communications from the official receiver, whose details are listed below, should be responded to and the official receiver has not authorised any third party to act on his behalf, especially in regards to recovering investor’s losses.

    damian.fantato@ft.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Why industrial property belongs in a balanced portfolio

    March 30, 2026

    UK property investment in 2026 – what’s in store for investors?

    March 30, 2026

    REITs boosted by UK property renaissance

    March 27, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    EPF Vs NPS Vs Mutual Funds: Which Builds A Stronger Retirement Corpus | Savings and Investments News

    April 6, 2026

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    EPF Vs NPS Vs Mutual Funds: Which Builds A Stronger Retirement Corpus | Savings and Investments News

    April 6, 2026

    Last Updated:April 06, 2026, 15:34 ISTArticle explains how EPF, NPS and equity mutual funds differ…

    SECP Launches New Funds That Let Investors Earn Profits By Saving the Planet

    April 6, 2026

    International ETFs Are Crushing VOO in 2026. Here Are 3 Worth Buying Now

    April 6, 2026

    Can Mutual Funds Pay Your Home Loan? This Viral Strategy Shows How | Savings and Investments News

    April 6, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Picton Mahoney Asset Management Provides Update on Fee Structure for Three Conventional Mutual Funds

    January 30, 2026

    Policy pressures, tight stock, and high demand: What’s shaping property investment decisions?

    October 2, 2025

    These 3 Vanguard Growth ETFs Are Worth Buying, Even Near All-Time Highs

    February 26, 2026
    Our Picks

    EPF Vs NPS Vs Mutual Funds: Which Builds A Stronger Retirement Corpus | Savings and Investments News

    April 6, 2026

    SECP Launches New Funds That Let Investors Earn Profits By Saving the Planet

    April 6, 2026

    International ETFs Are Crushing VOO in 2026. Here Are 3 Worth Buying Now

    April 6, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹10,000 monthly SIP in this mutual fund has grown to ₹1.52 crore in 22 years

    September 17, 2025
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.