Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Groww says direct mutual fund plans remain unchanged as it rolls out MF Prime
    • Best performing CEOs by Mutual Fund performance as of June 2026
    • Equity mutual fund inflows rise 26 pc to Rs 28,973 crore in June: AMFI data
    • Nithin Kamath explains difference between ‘direct’ and ‘regular’ mutual funds, urges investors to review plans
    • ETFs: Tip of the leverage iceberg
    • Analyst Reveals How $200 Billion in Leveraged ETFs Could Amplify the Next Market Selloff
    • Equity mutual fund inflows rebound as investors raise lump-sum bets | Mutual Funds
    • ‘Disappeared or pivoted’: Nithin Kamath takes aim after Groww adds regular mutual fund option
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Federal judge orders Bozeman municipal court to take disputed bonds • Daily Montanan
    Bonds

    Federal judge orders Bozeman municipal court to take disputed bonds • Daily Montanan

    October 29, 2024


    A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction and order that will force the Bozeman Municipal Court to accept the bail bonds of Helena-based Bad Boy Bail Bonds after two judges refused to honor them.

    John J. Looney, Sr., the owner of Bad Boy Bail Bonds, had originally taken his case to several district courts in the state, hoping to resolve the conflict, before moving on to federal court where district court Judge Donald W. Molloy has signed off on a preliminary injunction that orders two Bozeman municipal court judges, Carolina Tierney and Colleen Herrington, to accept Looney’s bonds, or resolve any objections within 48 hours.

    The case began more than four years ago when another business by the same name issued a $1,585 bond which was forfeited. Looney had since bought the rights to the company name, but not the bonding business. However, the Municipal court demanded payment from Looney, who protested that his business was not responsible for issuing the bond.

    Looney later filed a complaint with the Judicial Standards Commission, the state board that oversees judges’ conduct, alleging the judges were unfairly harming his business. In an effort to salvage his business in Gallatin County, Looney paid the bond, but emails records show that Tierney and Herrington would not lift the sanction unless he removed the complaint, something he was unwilling to do, which led to a flurry of filings in state and federal court.

    Looney has continued to push for vindication at the Judicial Standards Commission, although that process is confidential pending a final ruling by the board.

    The stipulated injunction was signed by Molloy last Friday, just days before a preliminary hearing in which the two municipal court judges could have been called to testify about their actions on the bench, an exceedingly rare event.

    In the stipulated order, which will stay in place pending the final outcome of the federal court case, Looney and Bad Boy Bail Bonds will be allowed to file bonds in Bozeman and Gallatin County. Looney will follow all state laws, but if there is a problem with any bond he issues, the judges must raise those within two business days and they will be resolved by the attorneys representing Tierney and Herrington, and lawyer Matthew Monforton, who represents Looney.

    As of Tuesday, Monforton said he wasn’t sure if Looney or his agents had issued any bail bonds in Gallatin County, but Monforton said he’s sent a copy of the federal court’s order to the Gallatin County Attorney and the Gallatin County Detention facility. Monforton said he also sent the same to Yellowstone County because there was a question whether other counties were beginning to reject Looney’s bonds because of problems in Gallatin County.

    The case also raises interesting questions of control of bail bonds. The Montana Constitution says that in most cases, defendants should have the right to bail. Bail bonding companies are overseen by the Montana Auditor and Commissioner of Securities and Insurance. Though the judges had originally filed a complaint with the Auditor’s office about Looney, that complaint was dismissed, and Bad Boy Bail Bonds has remained both active and in good standing, raising the question about whether a judge can reject a bond from a company licensed and in good standing.

    For now, Monforton told the Daily Montanan that Looney is back in business, but that doesn’t necessarily end the court case.

    Because the federal lawsuit alleges that the judges interfered with Looney’s federal constitutional rights, including the freedom of speech when he filed a complaint at the Judicial Standards Commission, the case will continue as he has ask for both compensatory and punitive damages. However, the injunction forcing the municipal court to accept the bonds will remain in place until the conclusion of the case or unless Molloy issues a different order.

    “This is unqualified good news,” Monforton said. “It was clearly a sign that the municipal court judges knew they were wrong.”

    241025 (28) Stipulated Preliminary Injunction



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    ‘Can’t buy bonds, can’t sell stocks.’ Bank of America tells investors what they can do.

    July 10, 2026

    £338 warning issued to millions of NS&I Premium Bonds holders

    July 10, 2026

    HUDCO Plans Social Impact Bonds To Fund Urban Infrastructure Projects

    July 9, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Groww says direct mutual fund plans remain unchanged as it rolls out MF Prime

    July 11, 2026

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Groww says direct mutual fund plans remain unchanged as it rolls out MF Prime

    July 11, 2026

    Groww said the product was introduced in response to demand from users seeking investment guidance,…

    Best performing CEOs by Mutual Fund performance as of June 2026

    July 10, 2026

    Equity mutual fund inflows rise 26 pc to Rs 28,973 crore in June: AMFI data

    July 10, 2026

    Nithin Kamath explains difference between ‘direct’ and ‘regular’ mutual funds, urges investors to review plans

    July 10, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    What They Are And Are They Safe January 2026 Edition

    November 19, 2024

    SEC Opens Public Comment on Four Solana ETFs in Next Step Toward Possible Approval

    February 11, 2025

    How to use an SIP calculator with an initial investment effectively?

    September 27, 2025
    Our Picks

    Groww says direct mutual fund plans remain unchanged as it rolls out MF Prime

    July 11, 2026

    Best performing CEOs by Mutual Fund performance as of June 2026

    July 10, 2026

    Equity mutual fund inflows rise 26 pc to Rs 28,973 crore in June: AMFI data

    July 10, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.