Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • New Fund Houses Deliver Split Return Fortunes
    • Top 7 Midcap Mutual Funds in 5 Years: Rs 28,00,000 lump sum investment in the No. 1 fund led to Rs 73.7 lakh wealth
    • Warning for 300,000 NS&I Premium Bonds holders set to go without prizes
    • WisdomTree’s Will Peck says the SEC just let a money market fund trade like a stablecoin
    • PE/VC investments drop 36% in H12026: EY-IVCA – Business News
    • Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund – Direct Plan – Growth
    • 4 ASX ETFs invested in mining that delivered 49% to 83% returns in FY26
    • 3 ASX ETFs that delivered 50% to 95% returns in FY26
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»Federal judge orders Bozeman municipal court to take disputed bonds • Daily Montanan
    Bonds

    Federal judge orders Bozeman municipal court to take disputed bonds • Daily Montanan

    October 29, 2024


    A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction and order that will force the Bozeman Municipal Court to accept the bail bonds of Helena-based Bad Boy Bail Bonds after two judges refused to honor them.

    John J. Looney, Sr., the owner of Bad Boy Bail Bonds, had originally taken his case to several district courts in the state, hoping to resolve the conflict, before moving on to federal court where district court Judge Donald W. Molloy has signed off on a preliminary injunction that orders two Bozeman municipal court judges, Carolina Tierney and Colleen Herrington, to accept Looney’s bonds, or resolve any objections within 48 hours.

    The case began more than four years ago when another business by the same name issued a $1,585 bond which was forfeited. Looney had since bought the rights to the company name, but not the bonding business. However, the Municipal court demanded payment from Looney, who protested that his business was not responsible for issuing the bond.

    Looney later filed a complaint with the Judicial Standards Commission, the state board that oversees judges’ conduct, alleging the judges were unfairly harming his business. In an effort to salvage his business in Gallatin County, Looney paid the bond, but emails records show that Tierney and Herrington would not lift the sanction unless he removed the complaint, something he was unwilling to do, which led to a flurry of filings in state and federal court.

    Looney has continued to push for vindication at the Judicial Standards Commission, although that process is confidential pending a final ruling by the board.

    The stipulated injunction was signed by Molloy last Friday, just days before a preliminary hearing in which the two municipal court judges could have been called to testify about their actions on the bench, an exceedingly rare event.

    In the stipulated order, which will stay in place pending the final outcome of the federal court case, Looney and Bad Boy Bail Bonds will be allowed to file bonds in Bozeman and Gallatin County. Looney will follow all state laws, but if there is a problem with any bond he issues, the judges must raise those within two business days and they will be resolved by the attorneys representing Tierney and Herrington, and lawyer Matthew Monforton, who represents Looney.

    As of Tuesday, Monforton said he wasn’t sure if Looney or his agents had issued any bail bonds in Gallatin County, but Monforton said he’s sent a copy of the federal court’s order to the Gallatin County Attorney and the Gallatin County Detention facility. Monforton said he also sent the same to Yellowstone County because there was a question whether other counties were beginning to reject Looney’s bonds because of problems in Gallatin County.

    The case also raises interesting questions of control of bail bonds. The Montana Constitution says that in most cases, defendants should have the right to bail. Bail bonding companies are overseen by the Montana Auditor and Commissioner of Securities and Insurance. Though the judges had originally filed a complaint with the Auditor’s office about Looney, that complaint was dismissed, and Bad Boy Bail Bonds has remained both active and in good standing, raising the question about whether a judge can reject a bond from a company licensed and in good standing.

    For now, Monforton told the Daily Montanan that Looney is back in business, but that doesn’t necessarily end the court case.

    Because the federal lawsuit alleges that the judges interfered with Looney’s federal constitutional rights, including the freedom of speech when he filed a complaint at the Judicial Standards Commission, the case will continue as he has ask for both compensatory and punitive damages. However, the injunction forcing the municipal court to accept the bonds will remain in place until the conclusion of the case or unless Molloy issues a different order.

    “This is unqualified good news,” Monforton said. “It was clearly a sign that the municipal court judges knew they were wrong.”

    241025 (28) Stipulated Preliminary Injunction



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Warning for 300,000 NS&I Premium Bonds holders set to go without prizes

    August 1, 2026

    AIR BALTIC CORPORATION ASEO-BONDS 2024(24/29) REG.S Bond

    July 29, 2026

    Stocks and bonds see wild ‘Fed day’ swings as Wall Street’s ‘crash cushion’ evaporates

    July 29, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023

    The patience payoff: How a ₹30,000 monthly SIP swells into ₹50 lakh by 2034

    July 31, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    New Fund Houses Deliver Split Return Fortunes

    August 1, 2026

    India’s mutual fund industry has witnessed a new wave of asset management companies (AMCs) over…

    Top 7 Midcap Mutual Funds in 5 Years: Rs 28,00,000 lump sum investment in the No. 1 fund led to Rs 73.7 lakh wealth

    August 1, 2026

    Warning for 300,000 NS&I Premium Bonds holders set to go without prizes

    August 1, 2026

    WisdomTree’s Will Peck says the SEC just let a money market fund trade like a stablecoin

    August 1, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    TappAlpha debuts S&P 500 daily covered call ETF | ETF Strategy

    August 20, 2024

    New ‘Anti-Elon’ ETFs Allow Investors to Avoid Tesla and SpaceX

    July 13, 2026

    What Savvy Investors Need to Know About Trading ETFs

    February 25, 2026
    Our Picks

    New Fund Houses Deliver Split Return Fortunes

    August 1, 2026

    Top 7 Midcap Mutual Funds in 5 Years: Rs 28,00,000 lump sum investment in the No. 1 fund led to Rs 73.7 lakh wealth

    August 1, 2026

    Warning for 300,000 NS&I Premium Bonds holders set to go without prizes

    August 1, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.