Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Specialised investment fund race gathers pace, investor accounts top 50,000 | Mutual Funds
    • Leveraged Samsung and SK ETFs risk overheating markets (KOR)
    • Find Transamerica funds and ETFs
    • Mutual funds still hate battered software stocks: By the numbers
    • Can Rs 1,000 A Month Really Make You Rich? A Beginner’s Guide To Mutual Fund Investing
    • 15-year SIP winners: Only 2 mutual funds delivered this rare 20%+ annual return – Money News
    • Best Mutual Fund In India? THIS MF Scheme Turned Rs 25,000 Into Rs 1.1 Lakh in Just 3 Years | Check Details
    • Bitcoin, Ethereum ETFs Shed $112M as Hyperliquid Funds Extend 8-Day Win Streak
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»JBND: New Active Bond ETF From JPMorgan (NYSE:JBND)
    Bonds

    JBND: New Active Bond ETF From JPMorgan (NYSE:JBND)

    August 19, 2024


    JP Morgan headquarters in London

    _ultraforma_/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images

    Thesis

    The Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (NYSE:JBND) is a new fixed income exchange-traded fund from JPMorgan. The vehicle represents another offering in the actively managed fund space, in addition to the ‘seasoned’ JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) which we covered here.

    JBND is a new ETF, having IPO-ed in October 2023, thus having a relative short history. As per its own literature, the vehicle aims to “deliver total returns from an actively managed portfolio of U.S. investment grade bonds”. In this article, we are going to have a closer look at the name, its composition, and analytics, and articulate why the ETF is a good long-term buy and hold.

    What does JBND do, and how is it different from JPIE?

    JBND is also an active fixed income ETF, but in comparison to JPIE, the fund aims for a higher duration (6 years for JBND versus 3 years for JPIE). Furthermore, JBND aims to have a greater focus on securitized products versus JPIE which looks at corporate paper to a larger degree.

    Let us have a look at the current JBND portfolio composition to better understand it:

    composition

    Composition (Fund Website)

    Treasury and treasury futures account for 34% of the fund, followed by Agency MBS paper at 30%, corporate bonds at 14% and ABS securities at 10%. Treasury futures are a balance sheet ‘light’ way of speculating on moves in interest rates, and active funds will use them in their build for shorter term speculative trades. By looking at the fund composition, we can see the ETF has interest rates as its main risk factor, which is further confirmed by its ratings breakdown:

    ratings

    Ratings (Fund Website)

    65% of the fund holdings are ‘AAA’, while the very highly rated sleeve represents over 80% of the fund holdings (AAA, AA, and A-rated names). When an ETF has such a high concentration in highly rated paper, an investor needs to understand the fund will have a very low sensitivity to credit spreads, and a high sensitivity to interest rates. Given the fund’s duration of 6 years, the ETF will be very dependent on the moves of the intermediate portion of the yield curve.

    Conversely, the other ETF from JPMorgan, JPIE, takes much more credit risk, with only 45% of its holdings in AAA, AA, and A-rated assets. This translates into JPIE having a higher credit spread sensitivity, while JBND is more rates focused.

    Performance and analytics

    In its short history, the fund has posted a very robust total return of 12.5%:

    Chart
    Data by YCharts

    While the figure on its own is quite high, let us have a look at what intermediate rates have done since the fund issuance:

    Chart
    Data by YCharts

    5-year rates have moved lower by roughly 100 bps since the ETF IPO-ed, thus being responsible for over half of the fund’s performance. Kindly keep in mind JBND has a 6-year duration, thus for every 100 bps of rate moves (lower rates that is), it posts a +6% NAV gain from duration. The fund also comes with a 4.3% 30-day SEC yield, but its main growth engine will be duration and the active management. Thus, duration and dividend yield are responsible for roughly 9% of its performance so far, while the rest comes down to active management and holdings choices.

    We are of the belief that this stage of the macrocycle is very favorable for active funds since managers can take advantage of fixed income markets distortions in real time, addressing those pockets that present the best risk-adjusted rewards.

    Let us also compare JBND with the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) which has a 7-year duration:

    Chart
    Data by YCharts

    IEF contains only treasuries, and targets the intermediate portion of the yield curve via its duration profile. Since JBND was issued, the name managed to outperform IEF by roughly 2.5%, which is down to active management. IEF has a slightly higher duration, which explains the additional 1% of total return versus our benchmark for JBND. Kindly also note the active management in the fund performance when rates moved higher at the beginning of the year. While IEF experienced a -3% drawdown, JBND had a much shallower one due to its active management and futures trading/positioning.

    Thus, from a risk/reward perspective, JBND has proven its mettle, being able to outperform IEF with a lower drawdown and overall volatility.

    Who should be interested in JBND?

    We believe investors interested in the intermediate portion of the yield curve that desire a more active management are well served by JBND. We saw from the fund composition section that the name does not take notable credit spread risk; thus its objective is more geared towards interest rates-driven products for its maturity tenor. JBND, however, is not a pure Treasury/Agency MBS play, but has managed to show narrower drawdowns and higher total returns when compared to IEF.

    We do not think JPIE and JBND investors overlap, since the two names represent different duration / composition choices. JPIE caters to lower duration, higher credit risk investors, while JBND is set up as an intermediate rates play. From a macro standpoint JBND makes sense at this point in the cycle, with the Fed set to cut rates in September 2024 and 2024 marking the end of a very fast monetary tightening cycle.

    Conclusion

    JBND is a fixed income ETF from JPMorgan. The fund came to market in October 2023 and has benefited from rates moving lower in 2024. The ETF is an active take on the intermediate portion of the yield curve, and currently consists of mostly AAA, AA, and A assets, which make up 80% of the holdings. The fund is up +12.5% since issuance, but an investor should look at the net spread of roughly +2.5% versus IEF’s performance (a treasuries only ETF). We are of the opinion the current macro regime is ideal for active funds, and that, broadly speaking, investors should buy and hold the intermediate portion of the curve with a 2-year time-horizon in mind. We like JBND’s active approach and its objectives, and thus are a ‘Buy’ for the name, with the above-mentioned holding period in mind.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    CDB bonds flagged by CSE after audit report

    May 26, 2026

    NS&I failures pile on the agony for bereaved families chasing missing premium bonds | Savings

    May 25, 2026

    What Treasury Bonds Yields Are Telling You Right Now

    May 25, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    Leveraged Samsung and SK ETFs risk overheating markets (KOR)

    May 26, 2026

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Specialised investment fund race gathers pace, investor accounts top 50,000 | Mutual Funds

    May 26, 2026

    The SIF vertical, which allows MFs to offer complex products to relatively sophisticated investors,…

    Leveraged Samsung and SK ETFs risk overheating markets (KOR)

    May 26, 2026

    Find Transamerica funds and ETFs

    May 26, 2026

    Mutual funds still hate battered software stocks: By the numbers

    May 26, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    Franklin Templeton seeks approval for Bitcoin, Ether crypto index ETF

    August 16, 2024

    Best mutual funds: Large-cap schemes that delivered over 20 per cent returns in the past 5 years – should you invest?

    August 23, 2024

    AEON MALL: Fonds d’Investissement et OPCVM en Position | 8905 | JP3131430005

    June 28, 2025
    Our Picks

    Specialised investment fund race gathers pace, investor accounts top 50,000 | Mutual Funds

    May 26, 2026

    Leveraged Samsung and SK ETFs risk overheating markets (KOR)

    May 26, 2026

    Find Transamerica funds and ETFs

    May 26, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹9000 monthly SIP can help you retire at 45 with ₹2 lakh monthly pension

    May 5, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.