Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Retail Investors Keep Pouring Money Into Mutual Funds Despite Prolonged Losses
    • Touchstone Funds Earn 2026 LSEG Lipper Awards for 10-Year Performance
    • Top investment options in 2026: Compare FD, PPF, Mutual Funds, ELSS and gold — which asset class is right for you?
    • 7 common mutual fund mistakes beginners must avoid in volatile markets
    • Run-up in US funds: Invest for market, currency hedge with 7-year horizon | Personal Finance
    • Bonds Only Modestly Weaker After New Escalation Over The Weekend
    • Bonds could lag stocks for the rest of 2026, according to this contrarian signal
    • Bitcoin Spot ETFs Add $996M in Third Week
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Bonds»SEC charges Alliance for publishing above market quotes
    Bonds

    SEC charges Alliance for publishing above market quotes

    October 22, 2024


    The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Alliance Global Partners for engaging in unfair practices and publishing daily quotes at above market prices on anywhere between 4,300 and 6,500 different municipal bonds between February 2019 and February 2021.

    The firm violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rules G-13 on quotes, G-14 on reports of sales or purchases, G-17 on fair dealing, G-27 on supervision and G-30 on prices and commissions, in addition to section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, the SEC found. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm agreed to settle the charges in the SEC’s administrative law court. The firm accepted a cease and desist order and agreed to pay disgorgement of $11,369, prejudgment interest of $2,407.38, and a $100,000 civil penalty.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission seal

    The quotes were executed for a specific customer that was a Sophisticated Municipal Market Professional and without independently evaluating the fair market values of the bonds at the time they were quoted. 

    “Alliance published the quotes relying on the Customer’s status as a SMMP and deferring to the customer’s evaluation of the fair market value of the bonds,” the SEC said. “This was improper because Alliance knew that the adjustments produced quotes for the bonds at above-market prices and that the customer was using the quotes to generate sales of the bonds at prices that were higher than the evaluated prices disseminated by the industry-recognized pricing service that the customer used to measure its performance.”

    Alliance also executed sales attributable to the quotes in a principal capacity on 204 occasions, without evaluating the prevailing market prices on the bonds. 

    “As a result, on 193 occasions, Alliance purchased the bonds from its customer at above market prices and sold the bonds at higher prices to dealers that, in turn, sold the bonds to investors, or to other dealers that sold the bonds to investors, at even higher prices,” the SEC said. “In at least 51 instances, Alliance paid its customers above-market prices that were unfair and unreasonable and failed to identify these trades as ‘away from the market’ when it reported them to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Real Time Transaction Reporting System for display on the MSRB’s Electronic Municipal Market Access platform.”

    The SEC said that the pricing failures created a risk to the market as other market participants relied on the inflated prices to price or value the same or similar bonds.

    “The customer for whom Alliance disseminated the above-market quotes benefited from the above-market, and in some cases unfair and unreasonable, prices it received from the sale of the bonds,” the SEC said. “However, the dealers that acquired the bonds directly or through inter-dealer transactions from Alliance passed the inflated prices that they paid for the bonds on to their customers.”

    The prices that downstream investors paid exceeded $1.00 or more on 157 occasions, exceeded $2.00 or more on 105 occasions and exceeded $3.00 or more on 47 occasions. 

    The investigation was supervised by Kevin B. Currid and conducted by Sue Curtin and Jon Wilcox of the Public Finance Abuse Unit, with assistance from the staff of the MSRB.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    Bonds Only Modestly Weaker After New Escalation Over The Weekend

    April 20, 2026

    Bonds could lag stocks for the rest of 2026, according to this contrarian signal

    April 20, 2026

    Bonds, Cash Remain Top Sources of Ballast for Equity Investors

    April 19, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Retail Investors Keep Pouring Money Into Mutual Funds Despite Prolonged Losses

    April 20, 2026

    The Shifting Landscape of Art Investment and the Rise of Accessibility: The London Art Exchange

    September 11, 2023

    Charlie Cobham: The Art Broker Extraordinaire Maximizing Returns for High Net Worth Clients

    February 12, 2024

    The Unyielding Resilience of the Art Market: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective

    November 19, 2023
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    Retail Investors Keep Pouring Money Into Mutual Funds Despite Prolonged Losses

    April 20, 2026

    Indian retail investors are displaying unusual patience in the face of weak market returns, continuing…

    Touchstone Funds Earn 2026 LSEG Lipper Awards for 10-Year Performance

    April 20, 2026

    Top investment options in 2026: Compare FD, PPF, Mutual Funds, ELSS and gold — which asset class is right for you?

    April 20, 2026

    7 common mutual fund mistakes beginners must avoid in volatile markets

    April 20, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    3 ETFs That Let You Bet On XRP Without Buying The Coins

    March 21, 2026

    Is property still a good investment? Here’s what winners and losers of past 15 years reveal | Money News

    December 4, 2025

    Active ETFs reach new record of $1.86tn

    December 23, 2025
    Our Picks

    Retail Investors Keep Pouring Money Into Mutual Funds Despite Prolonged Losses

    April 20, 2026

    Touchstone Funds Earn 2026 LSEG Lipper Awards for 10-Year Performance

    April 20, 2026

    Top investment options in 2026: Compare FD, PPF, Mutual Funds, ELSS and gold — which asset class is right for you?

    April 20, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    ₹50 lakh retirement corpus: How to invest in SCSS, mutual funds, equities and other assets — CA offers tips

    April 16, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.