Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • New entrants eat into SIP inflows of listed Mutual funds
    • Meitav’s Mutual Funds Division Soars: Surge in Market Share Driven by Record-Breaking Inflows
    • 3 Top-Ranked Lord Abbett Mutual Funds With Stellar Track Records
    • I Bonds Now Pay 5.51%. Can Dividend Stocks Compete?
    • XRP ETFs Draw $1.81B Despite $440M Paper Losses
    • Bitcoin ETFs bleed $1.16 billion in three days as price holds above $76,000
    • Leverage Shares by Themes Prepares Short Anthropic ETFs ANSS and ANDD as the Bear Case for the ANT IPO Comes into Focus
    • What Trade-Offs Do Active ETFs Face?
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»ETFs»SOXL vs. SSO: What Type of Investor Should Consider These Leveraged ETFs?
    ETFs

    SOXL vs. SSO: What Type of Investor Should Consider These Leveraged ETFs?

    March 13, 2026


    ProShares – Ultra S&P500 (SSO +0.83%) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL +4.33%) both use daily leverage resets, but SSO delivers 2x exposure to the S&P 500, while SOXL offers 3x exposure to a concentrated semiconductor portfolio, resulting in sharply different risk profiles and recent returns.

    Both funds are designed for traders seeking amplified daily moves, but their underlying indexes and leverage levels set them apart. SSO magnifies the entire S&P 500, giving broad market exposure, while SOXL zeroes in on the semiconductor sector with even more aggressive leverage. This comparison highlights the key differences in cost, risk, performance, and portfolio makeup to help investors weigh which approach could fit their strategy.

    Snapshot (Cost & Size)

    Metric SSO SOXL
    Issuer ProShares Direxion
    Expense ratio 0.87% 0.75%
    1-yr return (as of 2026-03-11) 37.3% 222.2%
    Dividend yield 0.6% 0.3%
    Beta 2.01 4.52
    AUM $6.5 billion $12.6 billion

    Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

    SOXL charges a slightly higher expense ratio than SSO, but both are at the higher end for ETFs. SSO’s yield is notably higher, which may appeal to those seeking a modest income stream from dividends.

    Performance & Risk Comparison

    Metric SSO SOXL
    Max drawdown (5 y) -46.77% -90.51%
    Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,234 $1,678

    SOXL’s triple leverage and sector focus have resulted in extreme volatility, with a five-year drawdown approaching (91%) compared to SSO’s (47%). Despite SOXL’s recent surge, SSO has delivered higher cumulative growth over the past five years, highlighting how leverage can amplify both gains and losses depending on market cycles.

    What’s Inside

    SOXL offers pure-play exposure to the semiconductor industry, tracking a basket of 44 technology stocks. Its top holdings include Micron Technology Inc (MU +4.56%), Nvidia Corp (NVDA 0.32%), and Applied Materials Inc (AMAT +2.14%), each making up less than 2% of the portfolio, and the fund has been trading for 16 years. Because SOXL uses daily 3x leverage and resets exposure each day, it is built for short-term trading, not long-term compounding, and is highly sensitive to sector swings.

    In contrast, SSO amplifies the S&P 500 using 2x leverage, resulting in exposure to over 500 large-cap U.S. stocks across technology, financials, and communication services. Its largest positions are Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc (AAPL 0.51%), with a more diversified sector mix. Both funds employ daily leverage resets, which can cause returns to diverge from the index over time, especially in volatile conditions.

    What This Means for Investors

    Both ProShares – Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) deliver heightened exposure to the S&P 500 and semiconductor sector, respectively. Here’s what investors need to know about these two ETFs.

    For starters, we must talk about leverage. Both of these funds are highly-leveraged. As a result, they are both highly volatile, and, consequently, not appropriate for every portfolio. What’s more, these ETFs are also designed to provide daily exposure. That means that, over time, the returns of these funds can drift from their respective parent index.

    That said, these funds can deliver incredibly amplified rates of return. SOXL, for example, has advanced 72% over the last six months alone.

    However, those immense returns do come with risk and cost. As for risk, each of these funds has experienced significant drawdowns over the last five years. SSO’s max drawdown during that stretch was 45%; SOXL’s largest drawdown was 90%. As for costs, both funds have average to slightly above-average fees. SSO has an expense ratio of 0.87%, and SOXL’s expense ratio is 0.75%.

    In summary, these two ETFs are not for every investor. Indeed, they’re better suited for those with a very short time horizon and a taste for high-risks and potentially high-rewards.

    For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

    Related Posts

    XRP ETFs Draw $1.81B Despite $440M Paper Losses

    November 4, 2026

    Bitcoin ETFs bleed $1.16 billion in three days as price holds above $76,000

    November 4, 2026

    What Trade-Offs Do Active ETFs Face?

    November 4, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    All you need to know about accumulating “.L” ETFs as a Canadian investor

    November 3, 2026

    Gold ETFs: A look at inflows, AUM and returns ahead of Dhanteras 2026

    November 4, 2026

    New entrants eat into SIP inflows of listed Mutual funds

    November 4, 2026

    [Simple Explanation] What changes if government bonds are handled on the blockchain?|かんたん解説編集部

    November 3, 2026
    Don't Miss
    Mutual Funds

    New entrants eat into SIP inflows of listed Mutual funds

    November 4, 2026

    The inflows through systematic investment plan of leading listed mutual funds have taken a hit…

    Meitav’s Mutual Funds Division Soars: Surge in Market Share Driven by Record-Breaking Inflows

    November 4, 2026

    3 Top-Ranked Lord Abbett Mutual Funds With Stellar Track Records

    November 4, 2026

    I Bonds Now Pay 5.51%. Can Dividend Stocks Compete?

    November 4, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    EDITOR'S PICK

    South Africa’s Bond Auction Could Reshape Investor Sentiment

    October 11, 2024

    AT&T: Lingering Media Losses Pose Risks For Ma Bell And Her Baby Bonds (NYSE:T)

    August 19, 2024

    Mutual Funds Cash Pile Grew Faster Than Assets Driven By NFOs In June

    July 11, 2024
    Our Picks

    New entrants eat into SIP inflows of listed Mutual funds

    November 4, 2026

    Meitav’s Mutual Funds Division Soars: Surge in Market Share Driven by Record-Breaking Inflows

    November 4, 2026

    3 Top-Ranked Lord Abbett Mutual Funds With Stellar Track Records

    November 4, 2026
    Most Popular

    🔥Juve target Chukwuemeka, Inter raise funds, Elmas bid in play 🤑

    August 20, 2025

    💵 Libra responds after Flamengo takes legal action and ‘freezes’ funds

    September 26, 2025

    🇮🇸 CPP Investments and Equinix complete atNorth acquisition to support growth of leading Nordic data center platform

    September 1, 2026
    © 2026 Fund Focus News
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.