Close Menu
Fund Focus News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Sebi proposes Rs 25 lakh mutual fund-only PMS: What it means for investors
    • How $400,000 in BDC ETFs Can Pay $36,000 a Year and What the Default Risk Really Looks Like
    • SIFs, mutual funds, PMS or AIFs: Which investment route deserves a place in your portfolio?
    • REITs vs REIT mutual funds vs physical property: A complete guide to capital gains tax, TDS and post-tax returns
    • Dividend ETFs vs. Bond ETFs: Here’s Which One Makes More Sense for Income Investors in This Market
    • Nippon India MF tops mutual fund industry with over 40 million folios | Mutual Funds
    • SIP Build UK: Yorkshire firm acquired in multi-million pound deal
    • Is Money Rotating Back Into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs While XRP and HYPE Funds Fade?
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fund Focus News
    • Home
    • Bonds
    • ETFs
    • Funds
    • Investments
    • Mutual Funds
    • Property Investments
    • SIP
    Fund Focus News
    Home»Mutual Funds»Sebi proposes Rs 25 lakh mutual fund-only PMS: What it means for investors
    Mutual Funds

    Sebi proposes Rs 25 lakh mutual fund-only PMS: What it means for investors

    July 27, 2026


    India’s portfolio management services (PMS) industry may be headed for its biggest regulatory reset since 2020, with a new low-ticket category that could make professional portfolio management accessible to a wider set of investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on 23 July released a consultation paper proposing a comprehensive review of the Portfolio Managers Regulations, 2020.

    Sweeping proposals

    The key proposal for investors is a dedicated mutual fund-only PMS framework, managing only direct plans of mutual fund schemes including exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and specialised investment funds (SIFs). The minimum ticket size drops from Rs.50 lakh to Rs.25 lakh and the net worth requirement from Rs.5 crore to Rs.2 crore, with simplified certification, optional dealing room and waiver of exit load provisions.

    Portfolio managers operating under this framework may be allowed to charge a fixed management fee, capped at 2.5% of the client’s assets under management (AUM). Other than fixed management fees, managers would be able to charge performancebased fee or a combination of both fixed management fees and performance-based fee, with the explicit consent of the client.

    Biharilal Deora, Chairman, Association of Portfolio Managers in India, said the category “has the potential to widen access to investors to have professionally managed, customised investment solutions while preserving the distinction between traditional mutual funds and bespoke portfolio management.” With robust suitability norms it could also give registered investment advisors and large mutual fund distributors room to evolve, he added.

    Mayur Shah, PMS fund manager at Anand Rathi Advisors, questioned the separate registration requirement. “Existing portfolio managers could be given the option to maintain a dedicated client setup for this category, with separate demat accounts for each client and independent fund accounting, rather than being required to obtain a separate registration.”

    Wider universe

    The Sebi paper also proposes permitting investments in “to-be-listed” securities, allowing discretionary PMS to invest up to 10% of a client’s assets in investmentgrade unlisted debt securities, and opening up foreign securities, listed equity, listed debt and overseas funds investing in listed securities or overseas-listed REITs, under both discretionary and non-discretionary mandates. Foreign investments will be governed by FEMA, 1999, and will require explicit positive client consent.